![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 5,741
|
Re: All things offseason discussion part II
Vick wasn't even playing.
How is he a big loss?
__________________
REDSKINS FAN SINCE 1968 |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 59
Posts: 21,744
|
Re: All things offseason discussion part II
Vick was able to come in and run Kelly's offense, and had pro-experience. Before last year's run, Foles was not looking like the real deal, maybe he has matured and will be great, but if he reverts back to form, the lack of a quality back up will bite them (like it would any team in the NFL).
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 3,767
|
Re: All things offseason discussion part II
I have to agree. The switch from Vick to Foles and getting rid of Vick was win-win. Vick is a walking injury waiting to happen. Plus he makes too much to be a backup. The eagles are better off.
Who cares that the backups are not experienced. They will gain experience. Plus the Eagles have a much improved offensive line. I think they have the best O-line in the NFC East. That is a big advantage when you can run the ball and protect your QB. Takes a ton of pressure off the QB. 49ers and Seahawks have great O-lines/running games and great defense. Great recipe for winning. |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|