![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
| View Poll Results: IF (If If If) the Redskins Name Changed, Your Choice Would Be? | |||
| Warriors |
|
25 | 40.98% |
| Renegades |
|
4 | 6.56% |
| Rebels |
|
3 | 4.92% |
| Redtails |
|
5 | 8.20% |
| Redhawks |
|
6 | 9.84% |
| Bravehearts |
|
5 | 8.20% |
| Washington FC |
|
13 | 21.31% |
| Voters: 61. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 59
Posts: 21,744
|
Re: Redskins Trademark cancelled
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 134
|
Re: Redskins Trademark cancelled
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 7
|
Re: Redskins Trademark cancelled
Word definitions are determined one of two ways: prescriptively (authoritarian) or descriptively (democratically, determined by how they are in face used). Contemporary American dictionaries lean towards the latter.
Anyone who has looked up words in a dictionary knows there are often more than one senses or meanings listed for a given word. The word Redskins--the team name--is obviously not used disparagingly nor as a slur (the team named themselves that, fans are proud of the name, etc.). Therefore the patent office (as are name-changers) is making the error of conflating two different usages or meanings of the word Redskins, and should reverse their decision. |
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 134
|
Re: Redskins Trademark cancelled
Quote:
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|