![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
| View Poll Results: IF (If If If) the Redskins Name Changed, Your Choice Would Be? | |||
| Warriors |
|
25 | 40.98% |
| Renegades |
|
4 | 6.56% |
| Rebels |
|
3 | 4.92% |
| Redtails |
|
5 | 8.20% |
| Redhawks |
|
6 | 9.84% |
| Bravehearts |
|
5 | 8.20% |
| Washington FC |
|
13 | 21.31% |
| Voters: 61. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
MVP
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 10,164
|
Re: Redskins Trademark cancelled
Quote:
In the real world...not on paper or the internet...how is the term being used today in a generally disparaging way? How was it ever used in a generally disparaging why? A discussion on whether to change a name or ban a term because it is offensive ought to start with the aggrieved party A) actually being reasonably offended B) able to show said examples of said offense This seems like it should be simple enough. Instead the supporters of a name-change just say its offensive and move forward with their agenda. As far as I can tell its eerily similar to a Big Lie...tell everyone long enough that it's offensive and everyone will soon be offended by it. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Davidsonville
Posts: 1,783
|
Re: Redskins Trademark cancelled
Quote:
an old-fashioned informal name, now considered taboo, for a Native American Yankee has a similar definition: 1. derogatory often a native or inhabitant of the US; American Redskin, like Yankee, has largely been redefined to mean the name of a professional sports team. Before the recent media avalanche, a vast majority of the population associated the word with the football team more than anything else. And did the dictionaries JUST start to define Redskin as being offensive? If not, why the sudden movement to change a brand name that's been in existence for 80 years?
__________________
I am a system poster. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|