Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Redskins Trademark cancelled

Locker Room Main Forum


View Poll Results: IF (If If If) the Redskins Name Changed, Your Choice Would Be?
Warriors 25 40.98%
Renegades 4 6.56%
Rebels 3 4.92%
Redtails 5 8.20%
Redhawks 6 9.84%
Bravehearts 5 8.20%
Washington FC 13 21.31%
Voters: 61. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-26-2014, 08:53 PM   #1
los panda
Pro Bowl
 
los panda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,230
Re: Redskins Trademark cancelled

bravehearts?!? why is braves not an option?
__________________
9 21 28 33 42 43 44 49 65 81
los panda is offline  
Old 06-26-2014, 10:31 PM   #2
ram29jackson
Special Teams
 
ram29jackson's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 134
Re: Redskins Trademark cancelled

LOL now they are going after the Chiefs LOL, they are getting desperate
ram29jackson is offline  
Old 06-27-2014, 08:25 AM   #3
Alvin Walton
Pro Bowl
 
Alvin Walton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 5,741
Re: Redskins Trademark cancelled

Quote:
Originally Posted by los panda View Post
bravehearts?!? why is braves not an option?
Why does it need to be an Indian name?
__________________
REDSKINS FAN SINCE 1968
Alvin Walton is offline  
Old 06-27-2014, 09:03 AM   #4
skinsguy
Pro Bowl
 
skinsguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
Re: Redskins Trademark cancelled

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alvin Walton View Post
Why does it need to be an Indian name?
Identity. You gotta understand that not everybody on this board is a resident of the D.C. area, surrounding areas, or has been at some point. For me, I grew up 5 hours away from D.C. That isn't exactly being a part of the area, even though most of all Virginia is a Redskins state. So for me, I identified with the team by their name, logos, and color of uniforms. I don't have that hometown attachment to the team. So, if the team moved out west and still called themselves the Redskins, I'd still root for that team even if a new team moved into the D.C. area.

Having said that, I feel that most fans could embrace a name change if the change wasn't a complete and total change away from what the team is now. A name that could still embrace the old identity, colors, even the logo - if not for a transitional period. And then, once fans are used to calling the team the new name, then other changes (main colors if need be, logo, etc...) could gradually be mixed in. Over time, the change and transition isn't quite as harsh.

I understand the thoughts of some to just change the name completely, get rid of everything Washington Redskins, and just move on so that we're not having to hear about people like Susan Harjo or Amanda Blackhorse. But the truth is, that would be a very polarizing change. The hometown fans would embrace whatever, but the admirers from far away would be left feeling as if we got robbed.
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!"
skinsguy is offline  
Old 06-27-2014, 09:18 AM   #5
Alvin Walton
Pro Bowl
 
Alvin Walton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 5,741
Re: Redskins Trademark cancelled

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsguy View Post
Identity. You gotta understand that not everybody on this board is a resident of the D.C. area, surrounding areas, or has been at some point. For me, I grew up 5 hours away from D.C. That isn't exactly being a part of the area, even though most of all Virginia is a Redskins state. So for me, I identified with the team by their name, logos, and color of uniforms. I don't have that hometown attachment to the team. So, if the team moved out west and still called themselves the Redskins, I'd still root for that team even if a new team moved into the D.C. area.

Having said that, I feel that most fans could embrace a name change if the change wasn't a complete and total change away from what the team is now. A name that could still embrace the old identity, colors, even the logo - if not for a transitional period. And then, once fans are used to calling the team the new name, then other changes (main colors if need be, logo, etc...) could gradually be mixed in. Over time, the change and transition isn't quite as harsh.

I understand the thoughts of some to just change the name completely, get rid of everything Washington Redskins, and just move on so that we're not having to hear about people like Susan Harjo or Amanda Blackhorse. But the truth is, that would be a very polarizing change. The hometown fans would embrace whatever, but the admirers from far away would be left feeling as if we got robbed.
Not really, I haven't lived anywhere near DC since 1973 and if we have to change names I want to dump the Indian thing entirely.
__________________
REDSKINS FAN SINCE 1968
Alvin Walton is offline  
Old 06-27-2014, 12:59 PM   #6
los panda
Pro Bowl
 
los panda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,230
Re: Redskins Trademark cancelled

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alvin Walton View Post
Why does it need to be an Indian name?
doesn't need to be, just made sense to me to revert back to our original name.

what part of [brave] "american indian warrior" is offensive?

if it was my team, i'd keep the redskins name until my profits hurt or until they made me change it > i would change it back to braves, and keep our current logo.
__________________
9 21 28 33 42 43 44 49 65 81
los panda is offline  
Old 06-27-2014, 01:11 PM   #7
SirLK26
The Starter
 
SirLK26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,141
Re: Redskins Trademark cancelled

Quote:
Originally Posted by los panda View Post
doesn't need to be, just made sense to me to revert back to our original name.

what part of [brave] "american indian warrior" is offensive?

if it was my team, i'd keep the redskins name until my profits hurt or until they made me change it > i would change it back to braves, and keep our current logo.
Supposedly, Native American mascots "dehumanize" Native Americans.

If the name changes, we need to stay away from all Native American references. Because if we don't, we will run into this baloney again. Unless we make a clear distinction to let people know we're not referencing Native Americans, I say no to Braves, Warriors, and any other similar terms.
SirLK26 is offline  
Old 06-27-2014, 01:42 PM   #8
ram29jackson
Special Teams
 
ram29jackson's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 134
Re: Redskins Trademark cancelled

Quote:
Originally Posted by SirLK26 View Post
Supposedly, Native American mascots "dehumanize" Native Americans.

If the name changes, we need to stay away from all Native American references. Because if we don't, we will run into this baloney again. Unless we make a clear distinction to let people know we're not referencing Native Americans, I say no to Braves, Warriors, and any other similar terms.
giving into fools is not the answer
ram29jackson is offline  
Old 06-27-2014, 02:27 PM   #9
SirLK26
The Starter
 
SirLK26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,141
Re: Redskins Trademark cancelled

Quote:
Originally Posted by ram29jackson View Post
giving into fools is not the answer
What's your solution?

I don't see any way to effectively fight the wave of PCness that is sweeping the country. If it were just white governement liberals and the current minority of NAs that made up this particular part of the wave(the anti-Redskins angle), we could fight back. But this wave is like a tornado, tearing through the country and sucking up pretty much everyone in its path. It is now quite popular to either be offended at something, or to jump on someone else's "offense" bandwagon and go to town... or court... or the internet... and spread whatever outrage you're offended by, in order to gain the masses' sympathy, and/or soothe your own guilty conscience, and/or attempt to lift yourself up by putting on a show of sympathy or despairing offendedness. And so because of that, there's not just a few pro-name change people like there were in 90s; it's the majority of the country now, in my opinion. Seriously, there's even Redskins fans who have given in and have pity for those on the pro-name change side.

Remember this quote: "It isn't what it is, Tommy. It is never what it is. It's what it can be made to look like?" That is truth, ladies and gentleman... unfortunately, these people are very good at making the Redskins and our name look bad.

As long as Snyder is the owner, I think it's doubtful the name will change, unless some higher authority steps in and absolutely forces him to change it, which isn't entirely out of the question. I hope he continues to fight as long as possible, but I really don't see any way he can win.
SirLK26 is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 2.12165 seconds with 12 queries