![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,043
|
Re: Giants Game Negatives
You're too nice. He's earned a big fat F so far. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Hug Anne Spyder
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,596
|
Re: Giants Game Negatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: close to the edge
Posts: 4,926
|
Re: Giants Game Negatives
Quote:
i hoped he would prove to be a defensive force and worth good money, but having him prove he is not a defensive force and worth only decent money is the next best result for us imo. at seasons end, i want to have a clear and definitive picture on several players. rak is no. 1 on the list. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
From a Land Down Under
![]() Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 54
Posts: 24,379
|
Re: Giants Game Negatives
Quote:
Polumbus is number two. Not number two on the list ....just ...number two. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Woodside, CA
Age: 58
Posts: 4,013
|
Re: Giants Game Negatives
BTW, even though we just got whacked by the Giants, we STILL have the #4 offense and the #8 defense in the NFL: NFL Stats: Team
Crazy. Stats, of course, only tell you so much.
__________________
"Coach, what do you think of your team's execution?" "I'm all for it." -- Coach McKay |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
From a Land Down Under
![]() Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 54
Posts: 24,379
|
Re: Giants Game Negatives
Quote:
...and in this case tell us absolutely nothing. If our offense or defense finishes the year in the top 20 I will be amazed. I was excited about the offense going into the year, but it was always with the QB and right side of the line somewhere in the back of my mind. Now they are front and center in my mind. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Woodside, CA
Age: 58
Posts: 4,013
|
Re: Giants Game Negatives
I actually think our offense should finish in the top 20 -- maybe even top 10. We still have very good skills players, and with the exception of SF, Seattle, and AZ (3 of 12 remaining games), none of the other defenses we face are particularly good.
Our defense, on the other hand, started strong (against crap offenses), but without any real depth, the injuries are pretty harmful. We also have some folks consistently underperforming (Orakpo, Riley, and Merriweather, I am talking to you). If Hatcher can get healthy it helps a lot. And if Cofield can come back and perform well, that does too. I think Robinson has performed very well -- it's been a good surprise, and let's hope he stays healthy. Our secondary will be a mess -- not much positive to see there, although I am hoping the young guys (Amerson and Breeland, in particular, can show some growth by season's end). Our safety situation is just not good. Clark has leadership and is a solid tackler, but doesn't represent a threat to the passing game. When the D line isn' dinged up, the back of the D gets exposed even worse.
__________________
"Coach, what do you think of your team's execution?" "I'm all for it." -- Coach McKay |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|