Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Giants Game Negatives

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-30-2014, 03:45 PM   #1
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,043
Re: Giants Game Negatives

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lotus View Post
Yeah, so far Rak's big contract year is rather underwhelming.

You're too nice. He's earned a big fat F so far.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2014, 04:03 PM   #2
mooby
Hug Anne Spyder
 
mooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,596
Re: Giants Game Negatives

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
You're too nice. He's earned a big fat F so far.
At least we can avoid the "is he only having a great year because it's a contract year" discussion this time around.
mooby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2014, 04:47 PM   #3
over the mountain
Playmaker
 
over the mountain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: close to the edge
Posts: 4,926
Re: Giants Game Negatives

Quote:
Originally Posted by mooby View Post
At least we can avoid the "is he only having a great year because it's a contract year" discussion this time around.
there are 12 more games to evaluate rak .. but yes, at least we can avoid that uncertainty heading into a decision making offseason.

i hoped he would prove to be a defensive force and worth good money, but having him prove he is not a defensive force and worth only decent money is the next best result for us imo.

at seasons end, i want to have a clear and definitive picture on several players. rak is no. 1 on the list.
over the mountain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2014, 04:54 PM   #4
punch it in
From a Land Down Under
 
punch it in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 54
Posts: 24,379
Re: Giants Game Negatives

Quote:
Originally Posted by over the mountain View Post
there are 12 more games to evaluate rak .. but yes, at least we can avoid that uncertainty heading into a decision making offseason.



i hoped he would prove to be a defensive force and worth good money, but having him prove he is not a defensive force and worth only decent money is the next best result for us imo.



at seasons end, i want to have a clear and definitive picture on several players. rak is no. 1 on the list.

Polumbus is number two. Not number two on the list ....just ...number two.
punch it in is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2014, 05:16 PM   #5
calia
Playmaker
 
calia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Woodside, CA
Age: 58
Posts: 4,013
Re: Giants Game Negatives

BTW, even though we just got whacked by the Giants, we STILL have the #4 offense and the #8 defense in the NFL: NFL Stats: Team

Crazy. Stats, of course, only tell you so much.
__________________
"Coach, what do you think of your team's execution?"
"I'm all for it." -- Coach McKay
calia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2014, 05:30 PM   #6
punch it in
From a Land Down Under
 
punch it in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 54
Posts: 24,379
Re: Giants Game Negatives

Quote:
Originally Posted by calia View Post
BTW, even though we just got whacked by the Giants, we STILL have the #4 offense and the #8 defense in the NFL: NFL Stats: Team



Crazy. Stats, of course, only tell you so much.

...and in this case tell us absolutely nothing. If our offense or defense finishes the year in the top 20 I will be amazed. I was excited about the offense going into the year, but it was always with the QB and right side of the line somewhere in the back of my mind. Now they are front and center in my mind.
punch it in is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2014, 05:38 PM   #7
calia
Playmaker
 
calia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Woodside, CA
Age: 58
Posts: 4,013
Re: Giants Game Negatives

I actually think our offense should finish in the top 20 -- maybe even top 10. We still have very good skills players, and with the exception of SF, Seattle, and AZ (3 of 12 remaining games), none of the other defenses we face are particularly good.

Our defense, on the other hand, started strong (against crap offenses), but without any real depth, the injuries are pretty harmful. We also have some folks consistently underperforming (Orakpo, Riley, and Merriweather, I am talking to you). If Hatcher can get healthy it helps a lot. And if Cofield can come back and perform well, that does too. I think Robinson has performed very well -- it's been a good surprise, and let's hope he stays healthy. Our secondary will be a mess -- not much positive to see there, although I am hoping the young guys (Amerson and Breeland, in particular, can show some growth by season's end). Our safety situation is just not good. Clark has leadership and is a solid tackler, but doesn't represent a threat to the passing game. When the D line isn' dinged up, the back of the D gets exposed even worse.
__________________
"Coach, what do you think of your team's execution?"
"I'm all for it." -- Coach McKay
calia is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.88913 seconds with 11 queries