Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Carolina not happy with Gardner?

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-22-2005, 08:35 PM   #1
skinsguy
Pro Bowl
 
skinsguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
Re: Carolina not happy with Gardner?

Quote:
Originally Posted by illdefined
huh? if you're looking for a Gardner supporter here you definitely won't find one. in fact if the front office got it really right, we'd never have Gardner in the first place. either way, there's no beef with the front office anymore now that Gibbs runs the personnel show. stop tryin to stir up trouble.

I'm not trying to stir up any trouble, so shut your mouth and stop attacking me.
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!"
skinsguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2005, 08:39 PM   #2
illdefined
Playmaker
 
illdefined's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 50
Posts: 2,631
Re: Carolina not happy with Gardner?

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsguy
I'm not trying to stir up any trouble, so shut your mouth and stop attacking me.
i'm not attacking you. check your "hmmmmmmm?" post. whats that all about?
__________________
a fan. not a cheerleader.
illdefined is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2005, 04:45 PM   #3
56FAN
Special Teams
 
56FAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: MANASSAS VA
Age: 63
Posts: 323
Re: Carolina not happy with Gardner?

carolina must be over it and now the danster and company look pretty:cool-smil what a differance an off season makes.they ought to call him mr night life. that's what his issue is, out all night can't play during the day.
56FAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2005, 08:02 PM   #4
BigSKINBauer
Pro Bowl
 
BigSKINBauer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Age: 38
Posts: 5,688
Re: Carolina not happy with Gardner?

our wide receiver core is improved, Moss averaging 28 yards a pass, what the hell is that?, He is gonna break 1000 yards easy this season but i am pulling for upwards 1250, he is 1/5 of the way there. Big Big numbers for a wide receiver in our offense. As long as we win baby
BigSKINBauer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2005, 08:03 PM   #5
Riggo44
The Starter
 
Riggo44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: San Clemente CA
Age: 52
Posts: 2,390
Re: Carolina not happy with Gardner?

Gardner sure showed us! What a scrub.
__________________
Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.
Benjamin Franklin
Riggo44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2005, 08:37 PM   #6
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
Re: Carolina not happy with Gardner?

There were a few people that thought we should keep Gardner around another year and wait for his "breakout" season. After all, he did have one 1000 yard season a few years back.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2005, 09:24 PM   #7
skinsguy
Pro Bowl
 
skinsguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
Re: Carolina not happy with Gardner?

For the third and final time...put my freakin' username on your ignore list and stop bothering me.
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!"
skinsguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2005, 09:26 PM   #8
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Carolina not happy with Gardner?

illdefined, I think you're overanalyzing that "hmmmm" too much. I don't think skinsguy was trying to antagonize anybody
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2005, 09:39 PM   #9
illdefined
Playmaker
 
illdefined's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 50
Posts: 2,631
Re: Carolina not happy with Gardner?

ummmmm ok. just wanted to know what the argument was concerning the front office?? is it a current issue? no sarcasm, no nothing.

:confused: :confused: :confused:
__________________
a fan. not a cheerleader.
illdefined is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2005, 11:52 PM   #10
dblanch66
The Starter
 
dblanch66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Age: 60
Posts: 1,176
Re: Carolina not happy with Gardner?

This is Rod's career:
dblanch66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2005, 05:56 AM   #11
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 43
Posts: 17,620
Re: Carolina not happy with Gardner?

i don't see whats skinsguy said that was so offensive or deserved such deep analysis...
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2005, 11:14 AM   #12
illdefined
Playmaker
 
illdefined's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 50
Posts: 2,631
Re: Carolina not happy with Gardner?

Quote:
Originally Posted by That Guy
i don't see whats skinsguy said that was so offensive or deserved such deep analysis...
he didn't say anything offensive. just sounded like he was trying to start a discussion/argument about something, i just didn't know what.
__________________
a fan. not a cheerleader.
illdefined is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2005, 08:42 AM   #13
Hog1
Quietly Dominating the East
 
Hog1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Naples, Florida
Posts: 10,675
Re: Carolina not happy with Gardner?

Quote:
Originally Posted by theBIGC_1982
Did anyone else catch the little tidbit from Yahoo Sports' Charles Robinson:
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news?slu...yhoo&type=lgns

"Carolina Panthers wide receiver Rod Gardner was active over the weekend after sitting out the team's loss to New Orleans. But his progress is still slow, and hopes of him having an early impact in the passing game have evaporated.
There have been grumbles from within the organization that Gardner wasn't putting in the necessary time off the field to learn Carolina's offense, and that his Week 1 scratch was intended as a message. Currently listed as the No. 4 receiver, Gardner is going to be used only in running situations until the Panthers feel he's ready to contribute. "
There's a real shocker! Joe's wisdom strikes again
Hog1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2005, 09:01 AM   #14
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
Re: Carolina not happy with Gardner?

Guys, this is really childish.

Put each other on your ignore lists, or I'll do it for you. It's clear you can't play in the same room together.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-23-2005, 11:24 AM   #15
BDBohnzie
Playmaker
 
BDBohnzie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Frederick, MD
Age: 47
Posts: 4,628
Re: Carolina not happy with Gardner?

Can't we all just get along? this is a message board...ideas, thoughts, etc may come off differently to others. Not everyone reads into things the same. No use in dragging it out over several messages. If you want to settle it, take it to the PMs.

BOT, Gardner is certainly showing his true colors, but I think if he was still a Skin, he'd be producing. I am a Gardner supporter, but obviously the Skins went in a different direction. Business decision. He can still be a good receiver, however he won't be a 1 or 2 in Carolina, and that could be weighting his decision to slack. I wouldn't be surprised to see him released.
__________________
Bad Things man, I mean bad things...

“WE TOOK HIM IN THE SIXTH ROUND SO WE'RE NOT SMART EITHER.” - Shanny on what the Skins saw in Alfred Morris
BDBohnzie is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.20917 seconds with 11 queries