RG3 is back

[tshile]

Originally Posted by Mattyk

Minnesota has given up a lot of pressure to just 4 man rushes, so I won't expect another blitz happy game. Haz said last week was a little over the top.

oh great. so exactly what i feared.

haslett will spend the next 8 games thinking he can go back to generating a rush with 4 guys, playing our corners off 10 yards every play, and having our lbs drop into zone coverage over the middle.

because of the first 8 games that worked great more often than not.

[Avinash_Tyagi]

Originally Posted by tshile

oh great. so exactly what i feared.

haslett will spend the next 8 games thinking he can go back to generating a rush with 4 guys, playing our corners off 10 yards every play, and having our lbs drop into zone coverage over the middle.

because of the first 8 games that worked great more often than not.

He could be tossing out misinformation

[MTK]

Originally Posted by tshile

oh great. so exactly what i feared.



haslett will spend the next 8 games thinking he can go back to generating a rush with 4 guys, playing our corners off 10 yards every play, and having our lbs drop into zone coverage over the middle.



because of the first 8 games that worked great more often than not.

You can't keep up blitzing that much, sooner or later you get burned. It worked one game, doesn't mean it should be a season long plan.

[Defensewins]

Originally Posted by Mattyk

You can't keep up blitzing that much, sooner or later you get burned. It worked one game, doesn't mean it should be a season long plan.

I agree. You do not play all teams the same. Dallas' top WR is a big powerful receiver that is not a super speed WR. In fact none of dallas' WR's are feared speed guys that would give our physical CB's a problem.
So playing tight man AND BLITZING is easier against a team like Dallas.

[KI Skins Fan]

Originally Posted by Mattyk

You can't keep up blitzing that much, sooner or later you get burned. It worked one game, doesn't mean it should be a season long plan.

Our four man rush couldn't beat a table of bridge players from a Seniors Center.

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by KI Skins Fan

Our four man rush couldn't beat a table of bridge players from a Seniors Center.

Pretty much

[skinsfan69]

Originally Posted by KI Skins Fan

Our four man rush couldn't beat a table of bridge players from a Seniors Center.

[tshile]

Originally Posted by Mattyk

You can't keep up blitzing that much, sooner or later you get burned. It worked one game, doesn't mean it should be a season long plan.

Generally I agree with you.

But this defense plays different when they challenge wr's and go after the quarterback.

Our defense sucks when we give the qb 4+ seconds to find a receiver.

[Hog1]

Originally Posted by tshile

Generally I agree with you.

But this defense plays different when they challenge wr's and go after the quarterback.

Our defense sucks when we give the qb 4+ seconds to find a receiver.

There won't be many D that can afford to give a competent qb 4 or more seconds......

[tshile]

Originally Posted by Hog1

There won't be many D that can afford to give a competent qb 4 or more seconds......

Yup, which is why pressure on the qb is what normally defines the difference between good/bad defenses.