Skins vs. Colts Gameday Thread

[punch it in]

Two things to take away from this game. RG-3 and Jim Haslett should not be back next year.
If Colt effin McCoy can overcome the play of our oline and get rid of the ball in time than how come RG-3 cannot? Also please no excuses about the Colts D stinks. Lol. Griff has looked terrible against several defenses, both good and bad.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Skinsfanatic]

Originally Posted by punch it in

Two things to take away from this game. RG-3 and Jim Haslett should not be back next year.
If Colt effin McCoy can overcome the play of our oline and get rid of the ball in time than how come RG-3 cannot? Also please no excuses about the Colts D stinks. Lol. Griff has looked terrible against several defenses, both good and bad.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

That is funny. Preempting other peoples arguments by saying "don't talk about relevant contextual details".

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by Skinsfanatic

That is funny. Preempting other peoples arguments by saying "don't talk about relevant contextual details".

No what is funny is that apparently you are part of the group I was referring to....that think that RG-3 could have moved the ball against this lousy defense too. Lmao. Now that is funny.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Skinsfanatic]

Originally Posted by punch it in

No what is funny is that apparently you are part of the group I was referring to....that think that RG-3 could have moved the ball against this lousy defense too. Lmao. Now that is funny.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

See, I didn't make any such argument. However, instead of addressing the fact that you were precluding valid arguments, you attempted to claim I was making an argument I did not make so you could change the topic. Good job sir.

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by Skinsfanatic

See, I didn't make any such argument. However, instead of addressing the fact that you were precluding valid arguments, you attempted to claim I was making an argument I did not make so you could change the topic. Good job sir.

Wow that sounds like a lawyer on lsd.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Skinsfanatic]

Originally Posted by punch it in

Wow that sounds like a lawyer on lsd.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Actually, it sounds like a debate coach criticizing poor argument on the discussion board of a shitty football team.

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by Skinsfanatic

Actually, it sounds like a debate coach criticizing poor argument on the discussion board of a shitty football team.

I made a point that people were going to say Colt had a good game, because he played a shitty defense.
I than stated I did not want to hear that crap because (and this is a big because), I have seen Griff struggle mightily against equally weak defenses.
What exactly is it that you are "debating"? Im curious.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by Skinsfanatic

See, I didn't make any such argument. However, instead of addressing the fact that you were precluding valid arguments, you attempted to claim I was making an argument I did not make so you could change the topic. Good job sir.

I clearly pointed out the fact that Griff has struggled against both good and bad defenses, which would make your point a moot one. Whatever the hell your point was.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Skinsfanatic]

Originally Posted by punch it in

I clearly pointed out the fact that Griff has struggled against both good and bad defenses, which would make your point a moot one. Whatever the hell your point was.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

My point was that you are trying to preclude other peoples arguments to artificially support your own position. I am not sure how RG3's performance against defenses makes that moot.

[CASKINS]

Originally Posted by Skinsfanatic

That is funny. Preempting other peoples arguments by saying "don't talk about relevant contextual details".