Redskins vs Giants GameDay Thread

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by skins89moss

The officials on the field ruled it a TD. But the official booth reviews on all TD's told the refs on the field it was not TD . How many times have we had a bad called on us on the field get over turned in the booth ? We always get some lame BS called on us. I agree with Moss but didn't want him to get the penalty he should have spoken about it after the game .

I do not in any way believe their is an agenda of some sort to make sure the Redskins lose. If you really think about that I am sure you will realize it is just dumb. What I do believe is that bad football teams cannot overcome bad calls or stupid rules.....and when you lose those bad calls or stupid plays become excuses for losing instead of footnotes in a victory. Had we handled our business in the second half than nobody would give a crap about that play.
Years and years of not being good enough to overcome bad calls or stupid rules have literally morphed into this conspiracy theory that the refs and the league are out to get us. Lol.

[HailGreen28]

Originally Posted by punch it in

I do not in any way believe their is an agenda of some sort to make sure the Redskins lose. If you really think about that I am sure you will realize it is just dumb. What I do believe is that bad football teams cannot overcome bad calls or stupid rules.....and when you lose those bad calls or stupid plays become excuses for losing instead of footnotes in a victory. Had we handled our business in the second half than nobody would give a crap about that play.
Years and years of not being good enough to overcome bad calls or stupid rules have literally morphed into this conspiracy theory that the refs and the league are out to get us. Lol.

It's not a conspiracy, it's a consensus. Redskins are losers. Their QB didn't run it in. He must have jumped up, lost the ball mid-air, no TD! (Never mind the video that shows RG3 didn't jump up, he was a runner the whole time.)

That's how a TD by a QB that runs it in, gets overturned. People are so used to losing, they see the QB jumping up even though he didn't. Just because people say so. (Never mind the video that shows RG3 didn't jump up, he was a runner the whole time.)

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by HailGreen28

It's not a conspiracy, it's a consensus. Redskins are losers. Their QB didn't run it in. He must have jumped up, lost the ball mid-air, no TD! (Never mind the video that shows RG3 didn't jump up, he was a runner the whole time.)



That's how a TD by a QB that runs it in, gets overturned. People are so used to losing, they see the QB jumping up even though he didn't. Just because people say so. (Never mind the video that shows RG3 didn't jump up, he was a runner the whole time.)

George Brett is really tired of you trying to overshadow the pine tar incident with this garbage man.....

[NC_Skins]

Originally Posted by skins89moss

Yea it's a fumble when did he ever lose the ball or hit the ground ? The ball was bobbled but he never lost control of it .

He lost control of it. Noted by the picture below.

Originally Posted by HailGreen28

It's not a conspiracy, it's a consensus. Redskins are losers. Their QB didn't run it in. He must have jumped up, lost the ball mid-air, no TD! (Never mind the video that shows RG3 didn't jump up, he was a runner the whole time.)

Now you are just making up shit, and most of it is because you still don't clearly understand the rules.

The moment that RGIII lost the ball, he then falls under the rules as if a WR catches a pass. He must possess the ball all the way to the ground. It doesn't matter he regained possession before the goal line and crossed it, he has to possess through the landing. RGIII did not do that.

For any doubt that he didn't lose the ball:



Jump...Dive? What's the difference really? He dove for the goal line which is pretty much a forward jump.




Was the ruling correct? Absolutely 100% correct. IS the rule one of the dumbest I've ever seen? Absolutely 100%.