Vic Fangio and other to be interviewed for Defense.

[HailGreen28]

Originally Posted by Hog1

in his defense, how many secondaries have you seen with...."talent" like ours?

In what way is our secondary not talented? Amerson high draft pick. Hall highly coveted free agent in his ATL/OAK days. Clark, good safety Gibbs 2.0 and Steelers. Thomas and Breeland 4th rd draft picks.....

Our D coaches have sucked.

[SFREDSKIN]

49ers want to interview Fangio for the HC position and don't want to lose him as DC. On another turn of events, 49ers will interview Gase and Shanahan in Denver tomorrow. Report: 49ers will meet with Mike Shanahan | CSN Bay Area

[Hog1]

Originally Posted by HailGreen28

In what way is our secondary not talented? Amerson high draft pick. Hall highly coveted free agent in his ATL/OAK days. Clark, good safety Gibbs 2.0 and Steelers. Thomas and Breeland 4th rd draft picks.....

Our D coaches have sucked.

I will have to view your post largely as an attempt at jocularity?

[HailGreen28]

Originally Posted by Hog1

I will have to view your post largely as an attempt at jocularity?

It's hardly a "no name" defense. The real joke is saying this defense has been well coached. It hasn't been.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by HailGreen28

It's hardly a "no name" defense. The real joke is saying this defense has been well coached. It hasn't been.

It's not overly talented either. Coaching and talent are both issues.

[Hog1]

Originally Posted by HailGreen28

It's hardly a "no name" defense. The real joke is saying this defense has been well coached. It hasn't been.

Can you please point out in any of my posts where I indicated in any way that the Defensive secondary coaching staff (or any Redskins defensive staff) has done a good job.........or well coached

[HailGreen28]

Originally Posted by Hog1

Can you please point out in any of my posts where I indicated in any way that the Defensive secondary coaching staff (or any Redskins defensive staff) has done a good job.........or well coached

You made the excuse that our secondary wasn't talented. I proved that excuse wrong.

Just to clarify:
Amerson - 2nd rd pick
Breeland and Thomas - 4th round picks
Clark - proved he had talent with Steelers, didn't do a bad job here in Gibbs 2.0.
Hall - proved he had talent here and ATL.

We have a talented secondary. This is not a unit that hasn't received plenty of attention in the draft and FA, especially considering it's only one part of the D. So please don't use "talent" in our secondary as an excuse for our pathetic defense.

[Lotus]

Originally Posted by HailGreen28

You made the excuse that our secondary wasn't talented. I proved that excuse wrong.

Just to clarify:
Amerson - 2nd rd pick
Breeland and Thomas - 4th round picks
Clark - proved he had talent with Steelers, didn't do a bad job here in Gibbs 2.0.
Hall - proved he had talent here and ATL.

We have a talented secondary. This is not a unit that hasn't received plenty of attention in the draft and FA, especially considering it's only one part of the D. So please don't use "talent" in our secondary as an excuse for our pathetic defense.

He made no "excuse." He made an observation. He is correct that even though Haslett coached poorly, he wasn't given many tools to work with.

Can you tell me how the safety position was solidified in talent while Haslett was here? What long-term high-caliber starters were added?

[HailGreen28]

Originally Posted by Lotus

He made no "excuse." He made an observation. He is correct that even though Haslett coached poorly, he wasn't given many tools to work with.

Can you tell me how the safety position was solidified in talent while Haslett was here? What long-term high-caliber starters were added?

Here are the relevant quotes:

Originally Posted by htownskinfan

Just hope its not Raheem Morris,Ive never seen a secondary look as bad as ours

Originally Posted by Hog1

in his defense, how many secondaries have you seen with...."talent" like ours?

Lotus, it absolutely was an excuse. For Morris, not Haslett BTW. And Hog1 is as entitled to his opinion as anyone. But FFS, are ppl here in complete denial about everything?

We can argue about why the secondary sucked this year, but I have shown that talent isn't the issue. We can talk about performance, but talent, pedigree, is not an issue with our secondary.