Brunell

[illdefined]

back off. i was responding to someone else who brought it up by saying 'there's no telling...'

and wasn't Seattle blitzing a lot? that line was packed every down. i just thought our team was better than their pass-rush this time.

[wolfeskins]

Originally Posted by illdefined

back off. i was responding to someone else who brought it up by saying 'there's no telling...'

and wasn't Seattle blitzing a lot? that line was packed every down. i just thought our team was better than their pass-rush this time.

i'm mainly talking about your comment when you said you "bet there would have been more deeper completions" with ramsey as the starter. i believe the seahawks would have blitzed even more than they did and thus ramsey not having the time to sit in the pocket and make the deep throw.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by wolfeskins

i'm mainly talking about your comment when you said you "bet there would have been more deeper completions" with ramsey as the starter. i believe the seahawks would have blitzed even more than they did and thus ramsey not having the time to sit in the pocket and make the deep throw.

Good point, it's pointless to play guessing games as to what Ramsey would have done, because the circumstances would have been totally different.

Seattle would have had a different gameplan and attacked differently. It's not as cut and dry as saying well if Ramsey was in there he would have completed more deep passes. He could have also been sacked a few more times, thrown another INT or two, or not as been effective on 3rd downs.

This Ramsey stuff is really getting tired.

[wolfeskins]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

Good point, it's pointless to play guessing games as to what Ramsey would have done, because the circumstances would have been totally different.

Seattle would have had a different gameplan and attacked differently. It's not as cut and dry as saying well if Ramsey was in there he would have completed more deep passes. He could have also been sacked a few more times, thrown another INT or two, or not as been effective on 3rd downs.

This Ramsey stuff is really getting tired.

thank you.

thats all i was saying.

agreed.

[illdefined]

Originally Posted by wolfeskins

i'm mainly talking about your comment when you said you "bet there would have been more deeper completions" with ramsey as the starter. i believe the seahawks would have blitzed even more than they did and thus ramsey not having the time to sit in the pocket and make the deep throw.

yeah i know. i saw Seattle run-blitz almost every down, i think that's the general gameplan vs. the skins no matter who's QB. again, i just think it was our OLine outmatching this particular team's blitzing LBs and Dline. good look for us.