Next years QB

[over the mountain]

Originally Posted by Bucket

Throw across the field to the RB after a play action? You show me one team that has that in their playbook.

Sometimes I don't understand what fans see and it baffles me.

the first play was either:

1. screen right to RB that RG3 just went left/looked left for some reason; or
2. a decoy to have the defenders thinking screen/dump off and hope the safeties get caught staring into the backfield so RG3 can role opposite and hit D Jax long or garcon across the middle?

sadly, you cannot dismiss option 1. RG3 could have very well been confused. called the right play in the huddle but he ran the wrong play and everyone else ran the right play (called play assignment). .. or gruden got a little cute with a deceptive play.

---------------------------

what is totally sad is the sack at the 30 second mark.

how could RG3 even go into the film room afterwards and have to face/explain that to his coaches and teammates. that play is mind boggling. inept on so many levels.

i would have quit football vs facing that embarrassment.

but i still believe that if RG3 can just get his head right, he could be great.

if i see RG3 back peddle when there is no pressure next year, i will kill my tv. i want a new one anyway, maybe i could be like those rednecks and shoot it up?

---------------------------

the Rodgers play is diff bc:

1. protection wise, Rodgers roles to the side his coverage rolls to. RG3 did like a naked bootleg with no apparent receiver option
2. im guessing the guy leaked back to the opposite corner of the endzone was Rodgers 2nd or 3rd option. no way that guy was primary imo.
3. its effing Rodgers vs RG3.

[Bucket]

Okay.. Since this is becoming an issue and I have no fcking clue why I have to explain this.

1. The Rogers play wasn't even remotely the same type of play.
2. This should be one, but I'll have to be clear....... The objective of play action is to obtain a FLOW from the Linebackers in one direction to open up space on the other side of the field.

So after explaining that... WHY THE FUCK WOULD YOU THROW IN THE DIRECTION YOU ARE TRYING TO SHIFT THE DEFENSE!??!?!

It's like I'm not even on the same planet right now and we watch two different games.

[Hog1]

Originally Posted by Bucket

Okay.. Since this is becoming an issue and I have no fcking clue why I have to explain this.

1. The Rogers play wasn't even remotely the same type of play.
2. This should be one, but I'll have to be clear....... The objective of play action is to obtain a FLOW from the Linebackers in one direction to open up space on the other side of the field.

So after explaining that... WHY THE FUCK WOULD YOU THROW IN THE DIRECTION YOU ARE TRYING TO SHIFT THE DEFENSE!??!?!

It's like I'm not even on the same planet right now and we watch two different games.

Indeed......
You watch Bill B will be doing it this season......

[30gut]

Originally Posted by over the mountain

the first play was either:

1. screen right to RB that RG3 just went left/looked left for some reason; or
2. a decoy to have the defenders thinking screen/dump off and hope the safeties get caught staring into the backfield so RG3 can role opposite and hit D Jax long or garcon across the middle?

sadly, you cannot dismiss option 1. RG3 could have very well been confused. called the right play in the huddle but he ran the wrong play and everyone else ran the right play (called play assignment). .. or gruden got a little cute with a deceptive play.

Its a bootleg. Not a screen or whatever other narrative you invent.

how could RG3 even go into the film room afterwards and have to face/explain that to his coaches and teammates. that play is mind boggling. inept on so many levels...........if i see RG3 back peddle when there is no pressure next year, i will kill my tv.........i would have quit football vs facing that embarrassment.

Somehow the sentiments expressed above make it hard to believe that you actually believe this:

if RG3 can just get his head right, he could be great.

1....... RG3 did like a naked bootleg with no apparent receiver option

Incorrect.

[over the mountain]

Originally Posted by 30gut

Its a bootleg. Not a screen or whatever other narrative you invent.

Somehow the sentiments expressed above make it hard to believe that you actually believe this:

Incorrect.