Plusses and Minuses vs. Ravens

[That Guy]

Originally Posted by 30gut

If you had said Griffin has a higher sack rate then Cousins, (which you didn't) I would have agreed and like I told you already that would be very, very old news.

Lol, how are you gonna quantify Griffin getting hit more? Do you personally chart individual QB hits? Lol. So your 'he got hit more' is not a fact its an opinion.

Lol, oh but you were really referring to Kirk, which you didn't type but i should know but it doesn't fit my narrative? Lol, dude have some accountability for what you type.

This is pretty much what I predicted:

either you're being purposefully obtuse or you need things spelled out.

griffin has issues and we shouldn't be making excuses in his 4th year after seeing what we've seen. that's the point. the hits/sacks/injuries are a symptom of his lack of pocket presence, and used as an example, which you've gone off on a tirade/tangent about, but that's just deflecting from the main point, which you either missed completely or chose to ignore.

why would i be referring to colt when he's not the one starting? and by the way, his sack rate was still lower, so you're still wrong even if you want to go with that convenient colt/bob comparison. if you think 15% difference is "basically the same" i'd love to sell you my car for 15% over what it's actually worth. and congrats on predicting that i'd call you out on trying to make a strawman by using the worst possible comparison and still being wrong. do you want a cookie?

seriously.

[30gut]

Originally Posted by That Guy

either you're being purposefully obtuse or you need things spelled out

seriously.

Lol, seriously......obtuse. Yeah, that's it. When all else fails get personal huh? Sweet.

Your posts are rhetorical questions that are psuedo responses with no attempt made at addressing the actual posts to which you respond. You say/type one thing then lol start whining that you really meant this other thing that I should know. C'mon really who does that.

And for the final time the point you were trying to make (after many shifts/switches/swaps) is patently obvious and has been stated by others, myself included in far more detail with far more accuracy. News flash Kirk has a lower sack rate then Griffin.

Your 'that guy', lol.

Now that you finally finished your profound revaltion are you gonna respond to anything else in my post?

Proly not huh?
Cheers, you're the best...lol...'that guy'

[That Guy]

i'm sorry it took me spelling it out 3 different times for you to agree to what has been blatantly obvious to everyone else. I responded to your passive apologizing towards RGIII, i'm sorry that hurts you personally. my only real point (yet again) is that it's time for RGIII to be accountable (ie put up or shut up, the sack %s etc is just evidence in support of that, which you still continue to mistake as the main point for some reason). again, i'm sorry you missed that and felt the need to drag this thread down with tangential deflection and your passive agreesive crap.

there is no revelation, there is nothing profound, the goal posts never moved. again, it's always been a message about accountability and nothing else. you're really making this a much bigger deal than it actually is.

even now you're trying to minimize, well congrats bro.

[30gut]

Originally Posted by That Guy

...I responded to your passive apologizing towards RGIII, i'm sorry that hurts you personally.

Suuuure. But we'll get back to this.

my only real point (yet again) is that it's time for RGIII to be accountable (ie put up or shut up, the sack %s etc is just evidence in support of that, which you still continue to mistake as the main point for some reason). again, i'm sorry you missed that and felt the need to drag this thread down with tangential deflection and your passive agreesive crap.

I'm sorry you have such great struggles making and sticking to your point and chose to ramble around with rhetorical questions before shifting, swapping and swerving to a point which still had nothing to do with the post you responded to.