Giants Post Game Reactions

[Bucket]

Originally Posted by 30gut

I love it when the response to a post is hyperbole. I love how "commitment to run" is bullshit.

We didn't start the game down 2 scores. You don't have to stop running even if you're down 2 scores. Running the ball actually helps an OL. Running the ball actually helps the defense. You can be happy with a gameplan that gives the team's best weapon on offense 6 carries, I'm not.

We gave up 9 off the bat. We were running till then. You missed the whole point

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by Bucket

We gave up 9 off the bat. We were running till then. You missed the whole point

Not to mention we werent going to run it down the Gints throat either way. That was pretty obvious.

[Bucket]

Originally Posted by punch it in

Not to mention we werent going to run it down the Gints throat either way. That was pretty obvious.

Nothing with missing Lav on the first series.

We didn't abandon the run. The fair weather fans will say we did. The logical fans who understand the game on a NFL level will realize we passed because we were down 2 scores all game.

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by Bucket

Nothing with missing Lav on the first series.



We didn't abandon the run. The fair weather fans will say we did. The logical fans who understand the game on a NFL level will realize we passed because we were down 2 scores all game.

When u throw in the fact that the Giants after two weeks were dead last against the pass and number one against the run it becomes pretty freaking simple. Even though KC has never ever ever ever hit an open wr 30 yards away and so Gruden is a dumbass for expecting him to do so. LOL
My God did he have ample time and wide open guys. It was pretty obvious why the Giants were dead last against the pass. Too bad he couldnt take advantage. He simply played like dogshit. RG-3 or Colt would not have probably faired any better. Might be a long year if he dont tighten the screws.

[30gut]

I love how despite what i actually write people "know better".

I get it. We cant point out Js mistakes, even when asked because it means we think its all on J. Got it. Noted. Lol. I guess J did everything right. Apparently as the HC very little of what happens on the field is his fault.

Oh BTW the Gints pass defense faced Ryan and Room, 2 top tier QBs and passing offenses which obviously skews their pass defense rating/ranking. Good coaching is about playing to your strengths. If we were able to run the ball vs the Rams then the blue print to run against the Giants was there. From the outset we set out to establish a diverse and committed run game vs the Rams against the Giants we did not. We didn't even feature the multiple TE power run formations that worked from the week before.

If we're gonna talk football let's talk and not have all that other BS.

You can like the playcalling, I'm not knocking anyone's stylistic preference. But for me, I prefer function over form. And I don't think the ganeplan against the Giants is gonna help us win games.

Cheers

[rocnrik]

Originally Posted by Bucket

Nothing with missing Lav on the first series.

We didn't abandon the run. The fair weather fans will say we did. The logical fans who understand the game on a NFL level will realize we passed because we were down 2 scores all game.

Right on!! Its guys like you that keep me coming back to this forum..is it me or is there a lot of folks on here that just don't have a clue of how competitive the NFL is..and things are not always what they appear to be..geez Gruden did a good job of play calling in my opinion. I base that on if we don't give up the block punt for safety that resulted in td..the fumble in the end zone..the other missed plays that were there for the taking..so poor execution is to blame..we could have been in that game and may have won! I don't get some of these so called fans..i have wanted coaches gone in the past but only after it was clear they had lost the team..heck Gruden has got these guys playing tough.