Who is Kirk Cousins?

[punch it in]

His stat line yesterday, if everyone else came to play, would have read something like 30-38, 310 yards, 2 td's and 0 int's. This is being conservative since the damn drives all stalled due to a butterfingers fucking outbreak. It was a God damned epidemic! How many quartetbacks ( especially ones starting one of their first 20 games) go into fucking Foxboro and do that?
Edit: Garcons int should have been a first down and nice gainer. Carriers perfectly placed baby in a fucking blanket should have gone for 40 fucking yards!

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by punch it in

His stat line yesterday, if everyone else came to play, would have read something like 30-38, 310 yards, 2 td's and 0 int's. This is being conservative since the damn drives all stalled due to a butterfingers fucking outbreak. It was a God damned epidemic! How many quartetbacks ( especially ones starting one of their first 20 games) go into fucking Foxboro and do that?
Edit: Garcons int should have been a first down and nice gainer. Carriers perfectly placed baby in a fucking blanket should have gone for 40 fucking yards!

Oh jeez, we arent doing make believe stats now, are we?

[NoCalHail]

Wait....he has improved every week? I don't agree. He has been up and down the entire season, just like he has been in the past.

I won't hold the Pats game against him because of all the drops, but eliminating this game from consideration, he still hasn't really strung two good performances together in a row yet this season.

No one is arguing whether he is the "best option on the current roster" but that doesn't necessarily mean anything in the big picture other than the fact that we have mediocre-to-average QB's on the roster.

Game manager, average, etc etc etc......whatever the term may be. Where does he rank statistically against all other QB's in the league? Somewhere in the middle probably. So what does that make him?

The question isn't about 2015. This is likely a 6 win team regardless. This is about what we do beyond this season. Some of you are ready to lock him up long term based on what you have seen so far? Really? I completely understand a 1-2 year extension based on management feeling they need more time to evaluate while also giving them the option to draft or go out and sign another QB if they see fit, but I haven't seen anything from Cousins that screams out needing to make him the long term answer at QB for the franchise.

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by NoCalHail

Wait....he has improved every week? I don't agree. He has been up and down the entire season, just like he has been in the past.



I won't hold the Pats game against him because of all the drops, but eliminating this game from consideration, he still hasn't really strung two good performances together in a row yet this season.

So if you eliminate the second game of two good games in a row than he hasnt played two good games in a row? Gotcha.

[NoCalHail]

I wouldn't call yesterday a "good game"

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by NoCalHail

I wouldn't call yesterday a "good game"

Bullshit. 8 drops. Cousins was on the money.

[NoCalHail]

Originally Posted by punch it in

Bullshit. 8 drops. Cousins was on the money.

Dude. Settle down. I didn't say he was bad yesterday either. It's hard to really make much of a judgement out yesterday's game to be honest. A couple of those throws go for big yards if they are caught, others were short yardage would-be completions that probably don't keep drives alive anyway. It was a mixed bag. He also under throw Jackson early in the game when he was wide open behind the secondary.

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by NoCalHail

Dude. Settle down. I didn't say he was bad yesterday either. It's hard to really make much of a judgement out yesterday's game to be honest. A couple of those throws go for big yards if they are caught, others were short yardage would-be completions that probably don't keep drives alive anyway. It was a mixed bag. He also under throw Jackson early in the game when he was wide open behind the secondary.

You said "not a good game". I disagree, and to me that would be a bad game. Not good = bad. Lol. If the drops dont occur it is a really good game.
Edit: chico i just saw ur comments. Its not make believe that 8 drops affected his completions percentage or that the carrier drop alone cost him 40 yards. It is certainly not make believe that the garcon non catch resulted in his lone INT. You can choose to not read between the lines, or see the forest thru the trees or any other of the overused metaphors but KC passed the eye test with flying colors in Foxboro yesterday.