Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Battle for first place Skins vs Gints pregame thread

Locker Room Main Forum


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 11-27-2015, 06:14 PM   #10
CRedskinsRule
Living Legend
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 59
Posts: 21,745
Re: Battle for first place Skins vs Gints pregame thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfaninok View Post
Qbr is a dumb stat that espn only uses. Nobody cares about it
my points are still valid if you use QB Ratings,
one point was KC has problems with the Giants
KC against the Giants using QB Rating:
61.2
57.6
31.8
____________

The next point was that we would be in first place if we had a reliable consistent NFL QB
In 4 wins, Kirk's QB Rating : 110.3,91.8, 124.7, 158.3
in 6 losses, Kirk's QB Rating :68.8, 69.8, 69.7, 57.9, 68.4, 89.2

Winning either the Miami game or Giants game would have put us in 1st, winning both would have us with a 2 game lead.

_____________

Finally the 3rd point I said was that using QBR a > 70 score was a direct correlation to a win. The Panthers game breaks that a little, because while you could say >90 qb rating is a direct correlation to a win, no one is going to say that if KC had completed 2 more passes, or thrown one more TD, (either of which would give him a 90 qb rating, that we would have won that game.
CRedskinsRule is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.43007 seconds with 11 queries