Round 2 Nfl playoffs.

[J. Falcon]

Originally Posted by Giantone

Statements like your are the reason for drug testing in the work place today.

Excellent response. So again, how is he better than the 3 quarterbacks I mentioned?

Anyway, where the hell do you come off saying that shit? As if it were ridiculous to say the 3 quarterbacks I mentioned (arguably the 3 best ever) are better than Manning.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by J. Falcon

Excellent response. So again, how is he better than the 3 quarterbacks I mentioned?

Anyway, where the hell do you come off saying that shit? As if it were ridiculous to say the 3 quarterbacks I mentioned (arguably the 3 best ever) are better than Manning.

Okay you started the shit show tell us all why you think they(those 3) are better than Manning?

[J. Falcon]

Originally Posted by Giantone

Okay you started the shit show tell us all why you think they(those 3) are better than Manning?

Mediocre postseason stats. Only 1 ring.

The other 3 have 10 rings between them plus greater legacies. It's pretty simple. They carried their teams when it counted most.

Montana never threw an interception in any of the 4 Superbowls he won.

Brady won played in 6 Superbowls, won 4 and may well be on his way to his 5th.

Elway, hell, he may be thr best of the bunch. If pressed Inmay choose him out of the 4 to be my QB.

Those guys are proven winnrrd. Manning, not so much. Honestly not sure I would even rank Manning in the top 5.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by J. Falcon

Mediocre postseason stats. Only 1 ring.
Honestly not sure I would even rank Manning in the top 5.

....yeah wow .

[J. Falcon]

Originally Posted by Giantone

....yeah wow .

Another great response from you. Keep at it. You don't have much to say or counter, so you quote just the beginning and end of my post and respond with 2 words. I think it's safe to say you have no opinion here.

[mooby]

Originally Posted by J. Falcon

Mediocre postseason stats. Only 1 ring.

The other 3 have 10 rings between them plus greater legacies. It's pretty simple. They carried their teams when it counted most.

Montana never threw an interception in any of the 4 Superbowls he won.

Brady won played in 6 Superbowls, won 4 and may well be on his way to his 5th.

Elway, hell, he may be thr best of the bunch. If pressed Inmay choose him out of the 4 to be my QB.

Those guys are proven winnrrd. Manning, not so much. Honestly not sure I would even rank Manning in the top 5.

Just curious here, not trying to start an argument. The rings debate obviously plays a role to an extent, but I'm curious if that's the be-all/end-all of the debate or if it's just a part of the overall package.

Would you say Eli is better than Peyton? After all, 2 rings vs. one and you can argue Eli played a bigger role in those 2 wins then Peyton did in his.

Where does Dan Marino stand in your rankings? Is he all the way at the bottom since he never won a SB?

I get that SB wins definitely plays a part, but I don't believe that's the final argument. Is Roethlisberger better than Peyton? Not in my book. Football is one of the ultimate team sports. It's not like basketball where you can group 3 elite players on a team and compete for a championship 4 years in a row.

I honestly feel like Peyton gets a bad rap for the SB's, when the GM's strategy was "give Peyton a solid team and let him take care of the rest." For me the difference lies in the fact that when Brady went down for the year, the Pats survived and went 11-5 because that team was solid from the ground up. But when Peyton went down for the year they had one of the worst tank jobs I've ever seen. That's the difference.

[J. Falcon]

Originally Posted by mooby

Just curious here, not trying to start an argument. The rings debate obviously plays a role to an extent, but I'm curious if that's the be-all/end-all of the debate or if it's just a part of the overall package.

Would you say Eli is better than Peyton? After all, 2 rings vs. one and you can argue Eli played a bigger role in those 2 wins then Peyton did in his.

Where does Dan Marino stand in your rankings? Is he all the way at the bottom since he never won a SB?

I get that SB wins definitely plays a part, but I don't believe that's the final argument. Is Roethlisberger better than Peyton? Not in my book. Football is one of the ultimate team sports. It's not like basketball where you can group 3 elite players on a team and compete for a championship 4 years in a row.

I honestly feel like Peyton gets a bad rap for the SB's, when the GM's strategy was "give Peyton a solid team and let him take care of the rest." For me the difference lies in the fact that when Brady went down for the year, the Pats survived and went 11-5 because that team was solid from the ground up. But when Peyton went down for the year they had one of the worst tank jobs I've ever seen. That's the difference.

Well, I never said Eli was better than Payton, just that he had won more championships. I agree Superbowls can't be the be-all/end-all of the debate, but I do rank it high, as I do postseason performance as a whole.

[mooby]

Originally Posted by J. Falcon

Well, I never said Eli was better than Payton, just that he had won more championships. I agree Superbowls can't be the be-all/end-all of the debate, but I do rank it high, as I do postseason performance as a whole.

I never implied you did, I just wanted to throw a couple scenarios your way.