Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Kirk Cousins 24/7 thread

Locker Room Main Forum


View Poll Results: What should the Redskins do with Cousins?
Sign him to a long term deal 47 75.81%
Let him walk 4 6.45%
Use the franchise tag again 11 17.74%
Voters: 62. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-02-2016, 11:11 AM   #1
CRedskinsRule
Living Legend
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 59
Posts: 21,744
Re: Kirk Cousins 24/7 thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by That Guy View Post
dunno what they were talking about, but exclusive or non exclusive franchise tags are both 19.9m for QBs this year from everything i've seen. next year the price goes up a minimum of 20%, which would be 24m, which is also less than whatever they were discussing.
I don't think that the bolded line is right. This quote is from 2013 when the Ravens were signing Flacco (link
Quote:
NON-EXCLUSIVE FRANCHISE TAG: The non-exclusive Franchise Tag is the Tag that is used most often. It does not preclude the player from negotiating with other teams, but does allow the player’s present team to match any offer sheet or receive two first round draft picks if they decline to match.

The non-exclusive Tag is a one-year contract that is the average of the top five players at the position over the prior five years. For 2013, the non-exclusive Tag for Quarterbacks has tentatively been set at $14.6M.

While the non-exclusive Tag is certainly more risky in most circumstances, other teams have rarely bothered signing franchised players to offer sheets. Often, this is simply because either the player doesn’t want to pursue an offer sheet or because other teams simply aren’t interested in spending a lot of time hammering out a contract that likely will be matched by the player’s present team anyway.
...

The other main reason for the lack of offer sheets is the amount of compensation and money involved – (1) most teams don’t want to part with two 1st round picks and (2) if giving up two 1st round picks isn’t bad enough, it’s going to take a huge contract to dissuade the other team from matching the offer sheet. Simply put, teams are willing to sign free agents to huge contracts and teams are willing to use draft picks to acquire players, but teams are rarely interested in doing both to acquire a player.

EXCLUSIVE FRANCHISE TAG: The Ravens’ other option is to use the exclusive Tag on Flacco. The exclusive Franchise Tag precludes any negotiations between Flacco and other teams, so this version of the Tag would ensure that the Ravens couldn’t lose Flacco. While this is obviously a safer course, the trade-off from that protection is a much higher Franchise tender amount.

The exclusive tag is a one-year contract that is the average of the top five QB salaries for this year, at the end of the RFA signing period (which is usually five days before the NFL draft, so this year, April 19th). At this point, the exclusive Franchise Tag is expected to be over $20M. With a very tight Cap already, that is going to be a tall assignment for the Ravens and may force the team to release several players they would otherwise prefer to keep.
So in 2013 the difference was roughly $6M dollars, or the same as I understood the radio to be saying. I tried to find published salaries for both but only found the non-exclusive. But Wikipedia and other internet sources all agreed with the basic definition of the exclusive and non-exclusive salary determinations.

And logically, if it was the same cost to the team they would never do the less restrictive one, so it makes sense to me that the exclusive would bring a higher payoff to the player, because they are giving up more rights.

also on Von Miller's Exclusive Tag this statement was made:
Quote:
Under the terms of the exclusive tag, Miller would make the average of the five best-paid linebackers for the 2016 season so the value won’t be known for a couple of months. That would become a moot point if Miller and the Broncos sign a long-term deal before the July 15 deadline to get one done
So likely had they used the Exclusive tag we wouldn't know the exact value for a few months.

Last edited by CRedskinsRule; 03-02-2016 at 11:54 AM.
CRedskinsRule is offline  
Old 03-02-2016, 11:30 AM   #2
metalskins
The Starter
 
metalskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,464
Re: Kirk Cousins 24/7 thread

I dunno. I haven't seen any information on the exclusive being worth more than the nonexclusive. Maybe the difference only applied to 2013?
__________________
Reserved for a witty signature.
metalskins is offline  
Old 03-02-2016, 11:59 AM   #3
CRedskinsRule
Living Legend
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 59
Posts: 21,744
Re: Kirk Cousins 24/7 thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by metalskins View Post
I dunno. I haven't seen any information on the exclusive being worth more than the nonexclusive. Maybe the difference only applied to 2013?
From Wikipedia:

Quote:
The National Football League introduced the franchise tag in 1993.[1] There are two types of franchise tag designations: the exclusive rights franchise tag, and non-exclusive rights franchise tag:
An "exclusive" franchise player must be offered a one-year contract for an amount no less than the average of the top five salaries at the player's position as of a date in April of the current year in which the tag will apply, or 120 percent of the player's previous year's salary, whichever is greater. Exclusive franchise players cannot negotiate with other teams. The player's team has all the negotiating rights to the exclusive player.

A "non-exclusive" franchise player must be offered a one-year contract for an amount no less than the average of the top five cap hits at the player's position for the previous five years applied to the current salary cap, or 120 percent of the player's previous year's salary, whichever is greater. A non-exclusive franchise player may negotiate with other NFL teams, but if the player signs an offer sheet from another team, the original team has a right to match the terms of that offer, or if it does not match the offer and thus loses the player, is entitled to receive two first-round draft picks as compensation.

Under the Capped years a team can designate one additional player only as a transitional tag. A transition player must be offered a minimum of the average of the top 10 salaries of the prior season at the player's position or 120 percent of the player's prior year's salary, whichever is greater. A transition player designation gives the club a first-refusal right to match within seven days an offer sheet given to the player by another club after his contract expires. If the club matches, it retains the player. If it does not match, it receives no compensation.
CRedskinsRule is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 8.39676 seconds with 12 queries