Kirk Cousins 24/7 thread

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by metalskins

Only thing that has gotten my goat are all of these stupid fans from other teams that are repeating the same damn thing over and over again: "Kirk doesn't deserve a big contract, he didn't beat any teams with a winning record!" Blah, blah blah blah, fuckin' blah! You point out his stats and they say, "Those stats were against puny teams!" WTF????

Truth is, one of two things will happen next year. These fans will be eating crow, or they'll be even worse on Cousins if Kirk doesn't start out strong or beat any winning teams. And if the 'skins get rid of him, then they'll want him just like they're wanting RGIII now!

Well they could be right, he may not deserve the franchise tag, but he hit the lottery in terms of contract and timing. As Redskins fans we can all only hope that for once in a very long time, we got it right at the QB spot.

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

Well they could be right, he may not deserve the franchise tag, but he hit the lottery in terms of contract and timing. As Redskins fans we can all only hope that for once in a very long time, we got it right at the QB spot.

I think we certainly have. Im more worried about the defense than anything. Give KC a defense that can keep him on the field and from playing behind alot and the dude can be an assassin.

[Skinzman]

Originally Posted by punch it in

I think we certainly have. Im more worried about the defense than anything. Give KC a defense that can keep him on the field and from playing behind alot and the dude can be an assassin.

So can Rex Grossman... Went to a SB as the starting QB on a defensive dominant team.

So can Trent Dilfer... Won a SB as the starting QB on a defensive dominant team.

For that matter... So can RG3... Won a division as a starting QB where our defense was flat out horrible (a whole lot worse than KC dealt with this year)..

Saying a QB can win with a dominant defense is like saying a dime is worth 10 cents. Its a Captain Obvious statement.

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by Skinzman

So can Rex Grossman... Went to a SB as the starting QB on a defensive dominant team.



So can Trent Dilfer... Won a SB as the starting QB on a defensive dominant team.



For that matter... So can RG3... Won a division as a starting QB where our defense was flat out horrible (a whole lot worse than KC dealt with this year)..



Saying a QB can win with a dominant defense is like saying a dime is worth 10 cents. Its a Captain Obvious statement.

Whats a matter cat piss in your cheerios? Of course a dominant defense can carry an average or below average quarterback. BUT I did not say we need a dominant defense did I? I said that we got our QB and if we improve on a piss poor defense that he can be one of the best in the league. But you read whatever you would like.

Edit: u also may want to re-visit your statement about this years D vs 2012. They were both bottom of the barrel except this years D was worse against the run. So to say what Griff dealt with was a whole lot worse is just not true.

[Skinzman]

Originally Posted by punch it in

Whats a matter cat piss in your cheerios? Of course a dominant defense can carry an average or below average quarterback. BUT I did not say we need a dominant defense did I? I said that we got our QB and if we improve on a piss poor defense that he can be one of the best in the league. But you read whatever you would like.

Edit: u also may want to re-visit your statement about this years D vs 2012. They were both bottom of the barrel except this years D was worse against the run. So to say what Griff dealt with was a whole lot worse is just not true.

Its not a pissed im my cheerios statement. Did you say dominant defense? No... Did you describe dominant defense? Yes. You said a defense that keeps him on the field and keeps us from playing from behind. Simply put, you are describing Seattle. Thats not something that defines a good QB unless you simply rate a QB by wins.