Kirk Cousins 24/7 thread

[Skinzman]

Originally Posted by punch it in

A defense that can keep your qb from playing from behind alot (which is what i said) is dominant? They are Seattle, they are Superbowl caliber? Lol. Ok.
How about they arent so freaking bad (worse than 2012....again), that your quarterback isnt always playing from behind. How in the hell does my original statement describe a dominant / championship defense? Lol. If KC has a HALFWAY DECENT DEFENSE THAT CAN FORCE A FEW THREE AND OUTS AND NOT ALWAYS FALL BEHIND HE CAN WIN A SHIT TON OF GAMES FOR THIS TEAM. Is that better? Im saying the exact opposite of what you are trying to twist my words into. He can be the type of qb that puts his team on his shoulders with a halfway competent D. The exact and polar opposite of what Rex or Trent were. They were along for the ride with a dominant D.

You are still simply making statements that "insert QB name here" are true. I mean what QB, if they hardly fall behind, cant win a shit ton of games. Other than the pick 6 machines, the rest are a true statement.

And a "HALFWAY DECENT DEFENSE" isnt keeping you from falling behind. Half way to decent is still a crap defense. I dont think a crap defense will keep you from playing from behind a lot. That either takes a really good defense with a good offense or a flat out elite defense.

I still dont understand why it takes the defense of the Redskins to determine whether KC is an assassin or not. Again, unless you rate a QB on wins only. KC can play great and the defense shit the bed and we get a loss. Thats not on KC.