![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
A Dude
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 12,458
|
Re: Cap Implications of Josh Norman
Quote:
According to OvertheCap, here are the teams currently with more than $20M in space: Jaguars $53,746,852 bad 49ers $51,727,851 bad Browns $40,966,334 bad Panthers $31,028,214 very good Titans $29,422,028 bad Bears $22,012,772 bad Giants $20,977,063 bad Whatchu talkin bout, Willis?
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,755
|
Re: Cap Implications of Josh Norman
Quote:
My memory wasn't too bad because you actually validated what I said about some teams having that kind of salary cap. That said, Why on earth do you think the Giants or Bears are bad teams? Realistically, the Giants probably should have won the division last season, but let 3-4 games get away from them in the last few minutes. I retracted the "bad" statement and put us at mediocre. Let's be honest, in a better division, we wouldn't have been division champs. Our whole division sucked ass last year and we didn't beat a single team over .500. That's saying a lot. Remember, we are a year removed from being the #4 pick in the draft. We didn't accumulate that much talent in a years time to suddenly vault us into contender status. Are we Browns level bad? Absolutely not. Are we going to be favored to win our division this year? Absolutely not. My only thought was there isn't that much separating us from some of those teams with a lot of cap room. Why is it we spend on guys that don't produce. I think the fact that carrying over cap can benefit us much better than overpaying for a scrub that isn't going to merit his contract. (Luvao, Hatcher, Roberts, Culliver, etc) Even when we were bad, we still were at the brink of being capped regularly.
__________________
"So let me get this straight. We have the event of the year on TV with millions watching around the world... and people want a punt, pass, and kick competition to be the halftime entertainment?? Folks, don't quit your day jobs."- Matty |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 59
Posts: 21,744
|
Re: Cap Implications of Josh Norman
Quote:
QB - 22M top 10 money LT - 10M OL is top 10 money which is a bit scary with two rookies on the line WR 27M 2nd only to the bears CB - 27M 2nd only to the jets Defensively we are 16th in cap spending Offensively we are 2nd only to the Steelers I would say that WR is one place we currently over spend for the production we get, BUT that may change if QB and OL stabilize. I think most Skins fans like that the owner is willing to spend when the situation calls for it. To me, what that means is that we will never see a super large cap balance, but instead always just enough to cover our needs each year. Last edited by CRedskinsRule; 04-26-2016 at 09:40 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,307
|
Re: Cap Implications of Josh Norman
Yeah I wouldn't call us a bad team....we are a team in transition.
I tell ya, that run to the playoffs the second half of the season...showed me a lot not only about Cousins (per the usual, QB gets more credit than deserved) but about Gruden and a team coming together. I seriously believe if Norman didn't believe we were a team on the rise then he wouldn't be here. If Cousins can continue his good play, and we do the 2 things McC has set out to accomplish this offseason: 1) build the run Defense and 2) improve the run game then we can be a team on the verge of being very good. Pass me that Kool Aid bitch
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler He Gets Us |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 5,741
|
Re: Cap Implications of Josh Norman
We are a good team.
We're in the top 40%. If we stay healthy we will win the division again and maybe win that elusive second playoff game.
__________________
REDSKINS FAN SINCE 1968 |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 43
Posts: 17,620
|
Re: Cap Implications of Josh Norman
well, we had that 36m penalty, and that forced some money into future years to work around it. if we had it, we probably would have spent it though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,300
|
Re: Cap Implications of Josh Norman
Quote:
The cap penalty hurt our depth the most. We still had big money "stars" on the team but we weren't able to get and keep that intermediate level depth across all positions to account for the inevitable injuries that occur during the season. In addition to hurting depth, the cap penalty directly hurt the quality of our special teams because those are the players that fill out that unit.
__________________
I'm tired of these monkey fighting snakes on this Monday to Friday plane! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 43
Posts: 17,620
|
Re: Cap Implications of Josh Norman
i mean, would you rather switch rosters with the 49ers this season and have their 50m in cap space? i wouldn't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,307
|
Re: Cap Implications of Josh Norman
San Fran ain't going nowhere with that roster in that division. Fisher and chip fighting again for the bottom of the west. I guarantee it.
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler He Gets Us |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|