![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,622
|
Re: 2016 NFL Draft (2nd and 3rd round) Day 2
I want more picks... trade back with New England to pick #60 and go DL, C, or S
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
From a Land Down Under
![]() Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 55
Posts: 24,585
|
Re: 2016 NFL Draft (2nd and 3rd round) Day 2
Quote:
I think we need bpa on Front 7 at our pick. We need it bad. Id trade up before I would trade back. I know its strange territory but we are morphing quickly from a team with a ton of holes to fill into a team that is a few pieces away from being really good. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,622
|
Re: 2016 NFL Draft (2nd and 3rd round) Day 2
Quote:
They need 2 or 3 DL, ILB, 2 Safeties, C, RB, QB |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
From a Land Down Under
![]() Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 55
Posts: 24,585
|
Re: 2016 NFL Draft (2nd and 3rd round) Day 2
Quote:
No team is two or three deep across the board. Lol. Though it would be nice. DL, ILB are needs. Big time. We have plenty of picks left to hit on both. We can wait on a project QB. RB can be addressed late. If we hit on a DL and/or ILB coupled with Norman than that should take alot of heat off of the S position. I disagree about having a ton of holes. Every team in the league rite now has atleast 5 positions on their team they could improve vastly on. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,622
|
Re: 2016 NFL Draft (2nd and 3rd round) Day 2
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
From a Land Down Under
![]() Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 55
Posts: 24,585
|
Re: 2016 NFL Draft (2nd and 3rd round) Day 2
Quote:
Id say CB is set too. Dont forget about Dunbar - he played really well last year. I agree 100% though with your position listing as far as what we need. After this draft those holes will shrink. Than there is always the guy or two that comes out of nowhere or has a bounce back year. So when this roster is finally set I think we might see at most 3-4 positions that we need help at. Which, imo, is far from alot of holes. Its normal. Seriously look at every team in the league and you will find 3-5 starters that are sub par. My original point was that I would rather get an impact playet where we stand now than trade back for what might amount to just acquiring bodies. This is not the team from the last 20 years that you go " damn we are several drafts away from competing". Lol. A couple key pieces taken care of from your spot on list of deficiencies and we can be as good as anybody. What makes teams great is rarely that they have good starters and quality depth across the board. Its that their studs play well enough to make up for the holes. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|