Did anyone else watch Comcast postgame? (Lavar Related)

[FRPLG]

Originally Posted by #56fanatic

I just went back to read some of your responces to see what it was you asked me. and to tell you the truth, it doesn't matter what I would say you would have called me wrong, or this or that. You get frustrated if someone doesn't agree with you. I hate to be the one to tell you, but your point of view may not be right either. As alot of the players in the NFL,NBA,MLB,NHL say this is a business, and if it means not playing a certain player because you defense if playing good without him, so lets save some money here, and limit his movement. You can't make the probowl if your not on field. but thats a seperate issue. There is no loyalty to players, teams, and mostly to the fans of the games. Teams can cut players and not pay the bonuses or remaining portions of the contract,except signing bonus, and players can walk out on their deals. The only loyalty going on here is by the fans. We buy all the stuff and drink the REDSKIN cool-aid all day long. Forgive those of us who feel there should be some loyalty shown by this team, that feel they owe a certain player the respect they deserve. They did the same thing to Brian Mitchell years ago. He did exactly what everyone said he would do, play with teams in the NFC east so he could play against us twice a year. We are the reason this team sells out every single game, and are the best fans in the NFL. You would feel the same way if you worked for a certain company and you went out sick or what ever and when you came back they had somebody doing your job and just pushed you to the side doing something you didn't want to do, or something they are not paying you to do. It happens everywhere. Maybe I am a little touched personally by the way they are treating LaVar, so what. I heard the dejection in his voice, the way he wants to be out there fighting for this team. He has been here through all the crappy years, and always said from day one he wanted to be a part of this team for as long as he plays , and he wanted to be here when things start turning around. I just think he deserves a TRUE shot at playing.

You're damn right I frustrated here. We have fans sitting here and without good reason or knowledge accusing people of lying and having personal vendettas for whatever reason. I have a problem with that. My main frustration comes from the fact that not one of those people has brought up a valid argument as to why Gibbs and Co. are wrong and Lavar is right. I would love to hear one! I am not saying that there aren't any but i haven't seen one presented here. The arguments are almost all based in conjecture and emotion. I have not once been this confused as to an opposing argument on this board in over a year. I truly baffles me as to why there is this ground swell of support for lavar and this apparent distrust of Gibbs and Co.
This is how I see the argument basically breaking down:
-Lavar was good when actually played like two years ago. He can rush the passer and plays very athletically. He made big plays and was dominant.
-He is 100% healthy now and is better than both Holdman and Clemons.
-Arrington had a dispute with the FO on his contract that created some bad blood as well as hard feelings about his injury situation last year
---All this equals to Arrignton not playing because they don't like some of the things he ahs done in the past and are willing to forego what he'd bring to the table by benching him.

Is this accurate?