![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Thank You, Sean.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Age: 40
Posts: 7,506
|
Yeah I saw it there too, and it was supposedly on espnradio. I havent heard it though. Or dont know what show it came from
__________________
#21 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 41
Posts: 3,109
|
If this is true, this has got to be the dumbest move the Skins could make. What the hell's the point? 2 first round picks? Niether one would be as good as Portis. New England's picks are low and we couldn't get a decent runner at that spot. There aren't even that many decent runners in the draft. This would be absolutely ridiculous!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Playmaker
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,159
|
I've heard about contact between the Skins and Pats but not in relation to a deal to send Portis to NE.
What I heard was that IF the Bailey/Portis deal is finalized, the Skins are looking to acquire more draft picks and would trade down from the #5 slot. Supposedly, they contacted the Pats to see if they could have the two low first rounders from the Pats for the #5 pick. The answer to that was "NO". The way it stands now - I hear - is that if the Skins get the early first round pick from the Pats they will also get a 3rd round pick with it. If they take the lower first round pick they then get a second with it. Obviously, I don't have the phones bugged in the Redskins' office - or in the Pats' office - so this is third hand info at best. Of those two choices, I would prefer they take the lower first round pick and a second roung pick. But that's just me...
__________________
The Sports Curmudgeon www.sportscurmudgeon.com But don't get me wrong, I love sports... |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: New Jersey
Age: 47
Posts: 270
|
I think we should just stay where we are....we need help now in the secondary and if Taylor is there at 5, grab him please...if he is gone, then trade down and grab a D linemen and have some extra picks
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Puppy Kicker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 8,341
|
I agree, Beg. I'm still curious who we nab in the FA market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Quote:
That makes a lot more sense. I had heard some #5 for the Pats' two first rounders rumors as well. Does anyone know which show this Portis rumor was on? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Bristol, CT
Age: 62
Posts: 1,001
|
They need to keep the 5 and draft Taylor. The Pats can shove their second or third round picks...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Thank You, Sean.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Age: 40
Posts: 7,506
|
If its #5 for 21/32, I would entertian it. But NE would never do that, so I say just use 5 for Sean Taylor
__________________
#21 |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 43
Posts: 11
|
I just saw WUSA 9 reporting on the rumor of Portis going to NE for their 1 (only 1 out of 2) and 2 rd picks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Thank You, Sean.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Age: 40
Posts: 7,506
|
So let me get this straight... Clinton Portis for the 21st and 64th picks in the draft?!?!?! That would be absoultey obsurd. I mean their second round pick is lower than ours was. So Essencially, we traded Champ Bailey for New Englands first round pick, if this deal was to go through. While we could have gotten a #6 from Detriot. How can anyone actually belive that. I mean break it down... we trade Champ Bailey and the 42nd pick in the draft for in the end ... the 21st and 64th pick in the draft? Are you f'n kidding me.. this thing is so bogus its not even funny.
__________________
#21 Last edited by Gmanc711; 03-01-2004 at 12:11 AM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|