Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Week 14

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-11-2016, 11:33 PM   #1
punch it in
From a Land Down Under
 
punch it in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 54
Posts: 24,416
Re: Week 14

Dak is a dink n dunk king, and if i hear his name mentioned about an MVP again im going to hurl. He has a very low ceiling.
punch it in is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2016, 02:24 AM   #2
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,610
Re: Week 14

Quote:
Originally Posted by punch it in View Post
Dak is a dink n dunk king, and if i hear his name mentioned about an MVP again im going to hurl. He has a very low ceiling.
Well he has been the qb on a 2 loss team and also had 19 td and only 2 ints going into the game tonight. Just great numbers for any qb, nonetheless a rookie. But definitely not an MVP. No way. Giants D really played well tonight.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2016, 08:59 AM   #3
TheMalcolmConnection
I like big (_|_)s.
 
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 44
Posts: 19,267
Re: Week 14

Quote:
Originally Posted by punch it in View Post
Dak is a dink n dunk king, and if i hear his name mentioned about an MVP again im going to hurl. He has a very low ceiling.
Same with Elliott. The dude has something like 60%-70% of his yards before contact. He's pretty good, but he shouldn't even be mentioned in the same breath as people like Adrian Peterson and even David Johnson. Demarco Murray did the same shit.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2016, 02:28 PM   #4
PorkSkins
Playmaker
 
PorkSkins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 4,443
Re: Week 14

Quote:
Originally Posted by punch it in View Post
He has a very low ceiling.
I said, similar on this board a couple weeks ago. He's gonna have to evolve his game or his style of play isn't sustainable.
PorkSkins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2016, 02:54 PM   #5
punch it in
From a Land Down Under
 
punch it in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 54
Posts: 24,416
Re: Week 14

Quote:
Originally Posted by PorkSkins View Post
I said, similar on this board a couple weeks ago. He's gonna have to evolve his game or his style of play isn't sustainable.


Yeah Exactly. Maybe the staff is holding him back. They are definitely very conservative it appears. Although based on what he was in college I do not think he will evolve into a Romo ever. It is definitely a tricky situation in Dallas, I mean you cannot change things when you are winning, but I feel like Dak has little to do with the sudden renaissance in Dallas. Zeke is a difference maker (though i give most credit to the o line). I think Lee is great and their D is playing way above their talent level - Marinelli and that oline have everything to do with their success. Garrett and Zeke are just along for the ride. Garrett just always looks like dumbfounded by their success. Like he wants to go "wow we won again". Lol. I honestly think Romo would have this team undefeated rite now. Dak was a disaster last night. His limitations-whether self induced or staff induced- have caught up with him.
punch it in is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.13900 seconds with 11 queries