Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


In Scot we trust?

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-04-2017, 11:28 AM   #1
Schneed10
A Dude
 
Schneed10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 12,458
Re: In Scot we trust?

PS can you tell I think a rangey FS is a very high priority in the offseason?
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.
Schneed10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2017, 11:37 AM   #2
FrenchSkin
Playmaker
 
FrenchSkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Yokohama, Japan
Posts: 4,525
Re: In Scot we trust?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Schneed10 View Post
PS can you tell I think a rangey FS is a very high priority in the offseason?
Haha yes and I completely agree with you on that!

Thanks a lot for your post!

The way I see it, switching back to a traditionnal safety scheme has some upsides and downsides, but there's nothing that complicated in the transition itself. Amirite?

Envoyé de mon TOMMY en utilisant Tapatalk
__________________
Derz Ambassaderz in the Land of the Rising Sun. Oui Monsieur.
FrenchSkin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2017, 11:40 AM   #3
mooby
Hug Anne Spyder
 
mooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,596
Re: In Scot we trust?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Schneed10 View Post
PS can you tell I think a rangey FS is a very high priority in the offseason?
I hope that's the case, we haven't had a decent safety since S.T. passed. Him and Laron were made for each other, they complimented each other perfectly.
__________________
Hail to the Football Team
mooby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2017, 11:52 AM   #4
punch it in
From a Land Down Under
 
punch it in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 54
Posts: 24,394
Re: In Scot we trust?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Schneed10 View Post
PS can you tell I think a rangey FS is a very high priority in the offseason?


Only thing I value more is a big time ILB. Mason has shown enough to warrant a starting role but I would love a stud to pair up with him. I just think that is the epicenter of any good defense. FS is an extremely close second. Than grab a slab of beef like a Snacks Harrison somewhere to obliterate the run.
punch it in is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2017, 04:22 PM   #5
calia
Playmaker
 
calia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Woodside, CA
Age: 58
Posts: 4,028
Re: In Scot we trust?

Quote:
Originally Posted by punch it in View Post
Only thing I value more is a big time ILB. Mason has shown enough to warrant a starting role but I would love a stud to pair up with him. I just think that is the epicenter of any good defense. FS is an extremely close second. Than grab a slab of beef like a Snacks Harrison somewhere to obliterate the run.
Have to give the Giants credit -- he was a great pickup for them. Dammit.
__________________
"Coach, what do you think of your team's execution?"
"I'm all for it." -- Coach McKay
calia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2017, 09:51 PM   #6
FlyerSkin
Registered User
 
FlyerSkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Greater Detroit area
Age: 56
Posts: 491
Re: In Scot we trust?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SouperMeister View Post
I'm not saying fire the GM, but this is not the team that McGloughan promised when he took the job. He sold us visions of tough, physical teams, and what we saw the last two home games, with a playoff berth at stake, was a butter-soft team on both sides of the ball. We can't run the ball, and we can't stop opponents from running down our throat. That's a bad recipe for winning December games when the weather is often a factor. It is time that Scot finally addresses our interior deficiencies on both lines through the draft and free agency. I hope that Josh Doctson is a stud, because that draft spot could have been used to fill a glaring deficiency in this lost season.
Two more seasons will tell the tale if Scott is the real deal or just a GM that worked wonders at his previous gig. We need to realize that most of the fans of most of the NFL franchises are in the same boat as Skins fans. We are hyped up with hope every offseason/draft that things will dramatically change for the better, keeping us continually interested, with the coaching carousel, new rookies/free agents, etc. To me the problem is mostly with the fans and unrealistic expectations that are generated by the hype. Remember when analysts gave our 2016 draft grade as either a B+ or A-, when after all was said and done it was rather average at best? Most of us bought into that stuff, and it wasn't based on any real sense of reality. The NFL is a corporation and the bottom line is money and that entails getting the butts into the seats, getting TV ratings, and getting fans to buy crap they really don't need. How do you do that? Either build a winner or create a sports soap opera, like you have with the Lions, Redskins, and others that love to tease their fan base on a regular basis. Think about it. Snyder had the Skins as the most lucrative sports franchise on the planet at one point, and they were average at best. IF a competitive winner isn't built 2 seasons from now I think it should be apparent that the whole thing under Snyder is just keeping interest in the team via chaos. I trust Scott to build a winner, but I am going to stick with the 2 year thing. Hopefully his 2017 draft is more like his first draft and even better. 2016 really wasn't as nearly as good as initially advertised.
FlyerSkin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2017, 10:23 AM   #7
metalskins
The Starter
 
metalskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,464
Re: In Scot we trust?

I, for one, trust Scot McCloughan completely. He's got my support. He can be here for the next 10 years at least as far as I'm concerned. I think he's doing great things for this team, and I think over the next several seasons, the rest of you guys will start to see it too. This team needs to be done with the proverbial revolving door at key positions. Not only do the leashes need to be lengthened, but they just need to be taken off completely. Allow these guys (the GM, the coaching staff, the players) to grow and build this team. While I'm not too crazy for Barry and won't cry if he is let go, I believe, overall, we stick with the same group of guys that has improved this team greatly over the 3-13 mess Shanahan left for us. Now his tenure was an example of a team not growing. At least with SM and Gruden, we've seen this team go from 4-12 to having two winning seasons. The way I see it is, you have first got to establish that this team can be consistently at or above .500 on a regular basis. Then you take this team to the next step at making them a playoff team on a consistent basis, and eventually a championship caliber team. The team has first got to learn how to win. Last year it was that the team couldn't beat any winning teams. This year, people said this team can't win on the road. So, that's the next thing to work on - being road dogs!

Guys and gals, we're getting there, just gotta believe and keep grinding.
__________________
Reserved for a witty signature.
metalskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2017, 10:39 AM   #8
SouperMeister
Playmaker
 
SouperMeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 61
Posts: 3,419
Re: In Scot we trust?

Quote:
Originally Posted by metalskins View Post
I, for one, trust Scot McCloughan completely. He's got my support. He can be here for the next 10 years at least as far as I'm concerned. I think he's doing great things for this team, and I think over the next several seasons, the rest of you guys will start to see it too. This team needs to be done with the proverbial revolving door at key positions. Not only do the leashes need to be lengthened, but they just need to be taken off completely. Allow these guys (the GM, the coaching staff, the players) to grow and build this team. While I'm not too crazy for Barry and won't cry if he is let go, I believe, overall, we stick with the same group of guys that has improved this team greatly over the 3-13 mess Shanahan left for us. Now his tenure was an example of a team not growing. At least with SM and Gruden, we've seen this team go from 4-12 to having two winning seasons. The way I see it is, you have first got to establish that this team can be consistently at or above .500 on a regular basis. Then you take this team to the next step at making them a playoff team on a consistent basis, and eventually a championship caliber team. The team has first got to learn how to win. Last year it was that the team couldn't beat any winning teams. This year, people said this team can't win on the road. So, that's the next thing to work on - being road dogs!

Guys and gals, we're getting there, just gotta believe and keep grinding.
This team is too soft to even protect its own house!!! 4-4 at home is completely unacceptable for a team that saw itself on the rise going into 2016. Until McCloughan adds size, strength, and toughness in the trenches, expect more of the same.
SouperMeister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2017, 10:42 AM   #9
sdskinsfan2001
Living Legend
 
sdskinsfan2001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Hanahan, South Carolina
Age: 43
Posts: 20,874
Re: In Scot we trust?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SouperMeister View Post
This team is too soft to even protect its own house!!! 4-4 at home is completely unacceptable for a team that saw itself on the rise going into 2016. Until McCloughan adds size, strength, and toughness in the trenches, expect more of the same.
I'm expecting to see a lot of players added in the front 7 on defense this year. Thru both free agency and the draft.
__________________
"You can be my wingman anytime."
"Bulls**t. You can be mine."
sdskinsfan2001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2017, 10:52 AM   #10
punch it in
From a Land Down Under
 
punch it in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 54
Posts: 24,394
Re: In Scot we trust?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SouperMeister View Post
This team is too soft to even protect its own house!!! 4-4 at home is completely unacceptable for a team that saw itself on the rise going into 2016. Until McCloughan adds size, strength, and toughness in the trenches, expect more of the same.


Dont forget speed on the edges, and guys who can friggin tackle!
punch it in is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2017, 07:00 PM   #11
FrenchSkin
Playmaker
 
FrenchSkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Yokohama, Japan
Posts: 4,525
Re: In Scot we trust?

Quote:
Originally Posted by punch it in View Post
Dont forget speed on the edges, and guys who can friggin tackle!
Honestly I've seen improvement on missed tackles this year (but it felt like it couldn't get worse the year before).

Only Whitner and Compton were missing tackles on a regular basis.
__________________
Derz Ambassaderz in the Land of the Rising Sun. Oui Monsieur.
FrenchSkin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2017, 04:46 PM   #12
metalskins
The Starter
 
metalskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,464
Re: In Scot we trust?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SouperMeister View Post
This team is too soft to even protect its own house!!! 4-4 at home is completely unacceptable for a team that saw itself on the rise going into 2016. Until McCloughan adds size, strength, and toughness in the trenches, expect more of the same.
Nope. Now since the defensive coaching staff has been kicked to the curb. I will expect better results with a few upgrades.
__________________
Reserved for a witty signature.
metalskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2017, 07:12 PM   #13
punch it in
From a Land Down Under
 
punch it in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 54
Posts: 24,394
Re: In Scot we trust?

Quote:
Originally Posted by metalskins View Post
Nope. Now since the defensive coaching staff has been kicked to the curb. I will expect better results with a few upgrades.


Of course that is what we said when Haslett left.
We need a damn guru.
punch it in is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2017, 07:46 PM   #14
Bangee7
Impact Rookie
 
Bangee7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Pa
Posts: 697
Re: In Scot we trust?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SouperMeister View Post
This team is too soft to even protect its own house!!! 4-4 at home is completely unacceptable for a team that saw itself on the rise going into 2016. Until McCloughan adds size, strength, and toughness in the trenches, expect more of the same.
+1 ...sums up my feelings.

Build from the lines out.
Bangee7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2017, 02:55 PM   #15
TheMalcolmConnection
I like big (_|_)s.
 
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 44
Posts: 19,264
Re: In Scot we trust?

Not sure I agree that the other teams have dominated us in the draft. You're referencing a lot of first round picks. It's GOOD those worked out, because they definitely should.

I'll give credit to the Cowboys for finding Dak, but I think anyone who can game manage could have done the same thing. I think a lot of people also thought Elliott was the best back to come out in a long time.

I think Crowder is far superior to Shepard, even though Shepard is OK. I think we've been competitive in the draft since Scot's been here. If I really think about it, I can't say one team really has any huge edge.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 1.38170 seconds with 11 queries