Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Trouble in Redskins Park?

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-09-2017, 02:46 PM   #1
mooby
Hug Anne Spyder
 
mooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,596
Re: Trouble in Redskins Park?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SkinsGuru View Post
prove that he wasn't drinking again
Prove that he was drinking again.
__________________
Hail to the Football Team
mooby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2017, 02:48 PM   #2
mredskins
Gamebreaker
 
mredskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 13,237
Re: Trouble in Redskins Park?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mooby View Post
Prove that he was drinking again.
Exactly you can't do either.
__________________
When life gives you paper jams, turn them into paper footballs!
mredskins is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2017, 02:53 PM   #3
mooby
Hug Anne Spyder
 
mooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,596
Re: Trouble in Redskins Park?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mredskins View Post
Exactly you can't do either.
Exactly. And when the alternative is credible outlets like ESPN/NLFN reporting that Allen and McC can't coexist I'm more inclined to believe that. Why is it so hard to believe that Allen would be jealous of McC getting most of the credit for rebuilding this team? Is jealousy not a thing that exists in the NFL world?
__________________
Hail to the Football Team
mooby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2017, 03:10 PM   #4
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
Trouble in Redskins Park?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mooby View Post
Prove that he was drinking again.


The guy is an alcoholic who by his own admission never stopped drinking. I would find it nearly impossible to believe that he's clean and sober.

Not saying it played a significant factor in all of this drama, but talking solely on the issue of whether he's drinking or not, I would find it awfully hard to believe that he's not drinking.

Mike Jones just said the other day all he does is watch film AND DRINK. Another WP insider article states that sources say yes he drinks but it's not impacting his work.

Dude is drinking.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2017, 03:37 PM   #5
mredskins
Gamebreaker
 
mredskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 13,237
Re: Trouble in Redskins Park?

Quote:
Originally Posted by MTK View Post
The guy is an alcoholic who by his own admission never stopped drinking. I would find it nearly impossible to believe that he's clean and sober.

Not saying it played a significant factor in all of this drama, but talking solely on the issue of whether he's drinking or not, I would find it awfully hard to believe that he's not drinking.

Mike Jones just said the other day all he does is watch film AND DRINK. Another WP insider article states that sources say yes he drinks but it's not impacting his work.

Dude is drinking.
Even in that article on ESPN back a few years when he was out of football he said he still drank lite beer. I mean you are still drinking if its 4 shots of Jack or 10 Coors Lite you are still drinking. I have never heard of or saw a alcohol program that said moderate use is acceptable for an alcoholic.

I am sure right now McC is 2 bottles of Dewar's in right now listening to White Snake's "Here I go Again".

I am totally joking on the last line kind of sort well not really.
__________________
When life gives you paper jams, turn them into paper footballs!
mredskins is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2017, 05:44 PM   #6
mooby
Hug Anne Spyder
 
mooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,596
Re: Trouble in Redskins Park?

Quote:
Originally Posted by MTK View Post
The guy is an alcoholic who by his own admission never stopped drinking. I would find it nearly impossible to believe that he's clean and sober.

Not saying it played a significant factor in all of this drama, but talking solely on the issue of whether he's drinking or not, I would find it awfully hard to believe that he's not drinking.

Mike Jones just said the other day all he does is watch film AND DRINK. Another WP insider article states that sources say yes he drinks but it's not impacting his work.

Dude is drinking.
Fair enough. Maybe the better scenario is: Prove his drinking is detracting from his work.
__________________
Hail to the Football Team
mooby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2017, 09:24 AM   #7
GridIron26
Playmaker
 
GridIron26's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Colorado
Age: 37
Posts: 3,743
Re: Trouble in Redskins Park?

Guys, this is coming from a person who like to read instead of posting and frankly I'm getting tired of all negative assumptions. As much as I am nervous about this whole situation (Cousins, Scot, and our FA players) - I know we have to stop making any kind of assumptions based on rumors. In fact, most of information regarding Cousins & 49ers trade are purely speculation; the reporter who first reported the story admitted that it was his own idea and he had a belief that it would happen. As we have seen from recent presidential election, a rumor has knack of rapidly becoming a fact-like; we need to distinguish rumors from facts..

Only "dysfunctional" areas Redskins are experiencing in this offseason is Cousins and Scot - we messed up big time with Cousins, however it looks that way only because we do not have full information. Redskins front office might have known they will encounter this issue, and they are expecting to sign Cousins to multi-years contract but they simply want to wait it out and see which side will break first, after all we cannot forget that the deadline to sign Cousins to a contract is in July, which is few months away. There are few factors that we do not know nor understand. As for our other FA players, Gruden announced they already have plans if we couldn't resign one of our WRs - this shows the front office and coaches are expecting this kind of loss and have a plan to remedy the loss (of course, the question is will the plan work?).

As for Scot part, I think this is only area where we messed up big time based on the article by Washington Post. I really hope we will find a way to keep Scot only because of his scouting talents.

That said, we need to take a step back and relax, wait for full information to come out and see what happens. By beginning of season this fall - if we lose Scot, Cousins and we did not find any decent players to replace the players we lost then that is when we all can take out our pitchforks and go to Redskins park.
GridIron26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2017, 09:24 AM   #8
Schneed10
A Dude
 
Schneed10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 12,458
Re: Trouble in Redskins Park?

I think you guys are looking at it wrong.

Bruce hired McC because he knew he didn't have the chops when it came to player evaluation.

But notice Doug Williams and Jay Gruden sat in all of the interviews at the combine.

I feel like some folks are getting it twisted and assuming that Bruce will run the draft board and the draft room. I don't, I think it will be Gruden. Now, nobody has said that yet. But that's how I read it.

So either you don't buy that and you hate Bruce, or you don't have faith in Jay?

I don't want Bruce running the draft board, but I don't think he will be. I'm good with Jay doing it. This isn't a calamity.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.
Schneed10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2017, 09:36 AM   #9
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,379
Re: Trouble in Redskins Park?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Schneed10 View Post
I think you guys are looking at it wrong.

Bruce hired McC because he knew he didn't have the chops when it came to player evaluation.

But notice Doug Williams and Jay Gruden sat in all of the interviews at the combine.

I feel like some folks are getting it twisted and assuming that Bruce will run the draft board and the draft room. I don't, I think it will be Gruden. Now, nobody has said that yet. But that's how I read it.

So either you don't buy that and you hate Bruce, or you don't have faith in Jay?

I don't want Bruce running the draft board, but I don't think he will be. I'm good with Jay doing it. This isn't a calamity.
The more I look at it, the more that I see that this is becoming Jay's team. It sounds like moving forward he will have more of a saying in player acquisition. BA will continue to have a say in terms of money and cap, which is fine with me.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2017, 09:27 AM   #10
CRedskinsRule
Living Legend
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 59
Posts: 21,744
Re: Trouble in Redskins Park?

Making it work here was SM's best shot at re-establishing himself. From all appearances that didn't happen. I would prefer he had gotten another 2 years, but let's be honest, his strength was supposed to be defensive magic, and he didn't work it here.

As to the FO set up it sounds to me, that minus the spin, the personnel selection system was a 3 person system, coach-gm-cap/president. It also sounds like Allen's vote counted more on contract issues. I don't think that's a bad system.
CRedskinsRule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2017, 09:32 AM   #11
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,307
Re: Trouble in Redskins Park?

Quote:
Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule View Post
Making it work here was SM's best shot at re-establishing himself. From all appearances that didn't happen. I would prefer he had gotten another 2 years, but let's be honest, his strength was supposed to be defensive magic, and he didn't work it here.

As to the FO set up it sounds to me, that minus the spin, the personnel selection system was a 3 person system, coach-gm-cap/president. It also sounds like Allen's vote counted more on contract issues. I don't think that's a bad system.
McC was just given 2 years that was clearly not enough time. AND we ALL agreed here this was a long term process.


My biggest problem with Bruce: 1. McNabb trade and then dumb contract 2. RG3 trade 3. Over ruling McC last year giving Cousins the extension.

these are pivotal management mistakes. I mean, set a franchise BACK mistakes. We all do understand this right?
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2017, 09:42 AM   #12
CRedskinsRule
Living Legend
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 59
Posts: 21,744
Re: Trouble in Redskins Park?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico23231 View Post
McC was just given 2 years that was clearly not enough time. AND we ALL agreed here this was a long term process.


My biggest problem with Bruce: 1. McNabb trade and then dumb contract 2. RG3 trade 3. Over ruling McC last year giving Cousins the extension.

these are pivotal management mistakes. I mean, set a franchise BACK mistakes. We all do understand this right?
I agree on #1, disagree on #2 except when looking in hindsight, and disagree wholly with #3. Having KC playout the year on a prove it deal was a bit of a risk, but honestly looking at how this year's negotiation has gone, and KC's apparent intransigence at being paid as an elite qb when he isn't, I don't know that a deal would have been reached last year, at least not one that was good for the team and good for KC.
CRedskinsRule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2017, 09:47 AM   #13
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,307
Re: Trouble in Redskins Park?

Quote:
Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule View Post
I agree on #1, disagree on #2 except when looking in hindsight, and disagree wholly with #3. Having KC playout the year on a prove it deal was a bit of a risk, but honestly looking at how this year's negotiation has gone, and KC's apparent intransigence at being paid as an elite qb when he isn't, I don't know that a deal would have been reached last year, at least not one that was good for the team and good for KC.
That's the great thing about history CRed,...Bruce's decision making at the QB position is GARBAGE.

These have proven to be major mistakes...which could have been adverted if we deferred it. 1 & 2 to the Shannies and 3 to McC.

clearly these have cost the Org
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2017, 09:54 AM   #14
CRedskinsRule
Living Legend
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 59
Posts: 21,744
Re: Trouble in Redskins Park?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico23231 View Post
That's the great thing about history CRed,...Bruce's decision making at the QB position is GARBAGE.

These have proven to be major mistakes...which could have been adverted if we deferred it. 1 & 2 to the Shannies and 3 to McC.

clearly these have cost the Org
QB decisions have been garbage by a lot of good GM's, fact is there are only a few times that the "right" one has been made.

That said, if the choice is solely a BA decision that's not a good thing, but I think JGruden and even DWilliams both have pretty good ideas of what qb's could be here instead of KC.
CRedskinsRule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2017, 09:33 AM   #15
Evilgrin
The Starter
 
Evilgrin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 1,074
Re: Trouble in Redskins Park?

We are going to have non-football guys picking players again. Who picked KC, who hates Shanahan. It's just about ego, and not being wrong. I didn't like Shanahan, he was right about Cousins(I was wrong about Cousins). Grow the eff up.
__________________
Bruce Allen “We’re winning off the field,”

Redskins #2 In Revenue Per Year!
Evilgrin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.69042 seconds with 11 queries