![]() |
|
|||||||
| Debating with the enemy Discuss politics, current events, and other hot button issues here. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 59
Posts: 21,745
|
Re: What would it take?
No one, not even Trump, is saying that you can't criticize the president. In fact, contextual criticism is always a good thing. But falsehoods, distortions, and vitriolic bias from either side should always be pointed out as such. CNN cloaking itself in the 1st amendment is a deflection from their ever increasing bias, and an attempt to shut down the legitimate questioning of bias reporters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 14,637
|
Re: What would it take?
Quote:
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/17/b...ople.html?_r=0 I find it amazing the bitching going on about CNN yet allowing FOX to get away with anything.Hypocritical .
__________________
....DISCLAIMER: All of my posts/threads are my expressed typed opinion and the reader is not to assume these comments are absolute fact, law, or truth unless otherwise stated in said post/thread. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 59
Posts: 21,745
|
Re: What would it take?
Quote:
CNN USED to be known for it's objective reporting. Yes it had a soft bias, but they did strive to report objectively. The point being made now is that yeah they aren't an objective source any more, but they scream press infringement when they are treated like any other biased outlet. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|