What would it take?

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

No one, not even Trump, is saying that you can't criticize the president. In fact, contextual criticism is always a good thing. But falsehoods, distortions, and vitriolic bias from either side should always be pointed out as such. CNN cloaking itself in the 1st amendment is a deflection from their ever increasing bias, and an attempt to shut down the legitimate questioning of bias reporters.

Yes he is,and when it's done he acts like a petulant little child ,to call the press the enemy is attacking it.Trump deserves all the shit coming his way .Some of you might not remember it but yes the press did make Donald Trump,for years in the 70's and 80's he was on page 6 of the NY.Post or the front cover of the Daily News doing one outrageous thing or another so ,yes, the press did make Trump.


https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/17/b...ople.html?_r=0



I find it amazing the bitching going on about CNN yet allowing FOX to get away with anything.Hypocritical .

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by Giantone

Yes he is,and when it's done he acts like a petulant little child ,to call the press the enemy is attacking it.Trump deserves all the shit coming his way .Some of you might not remember it but yes the press did make Donald Trump,for years in the 70's and 80's he was on page 6 of the NY.Post or the front cover of the Daily News doing one outrageous thing or another so ,yes, the press did make Trump.


https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/17/b...ople.html?_r=0



I find it amazing the bitching going on about CNN yet allowing FOX to get away with anything.Hypocritical .

I find it amazing that you can't grasp the difference. Nobody is saying Fox presents an unbiased point of view. In fact everybody is agreeing that Fox has a bias to the right, and when reading stories there you need to be aware that you are getting information that has a conservative bias.
CNN USED to be known for it's objective reporting. Yes it had a soft bias, but they did strive to report objectively. The point being made now is that yeah they aren't an objective source any more, but they scream press infringement when they are treated like any other biased outlet.