Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Cousins 3.0, he's going to sign the franchise tag

Locker Room Main Forum


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-15-2017, 01:21 AM   #1
KI Skins Fan
Pro Bowl
 
KI Skins Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Jacksonville, Forida
Posts: 6,412
Re: Cousins 3.0, he's going to sign the franchise tag

Quote:
Originally Posted by rocnrik View Post
Could it be possible that BOTH sides were to blame like you said in number 2..in that case The skins had to make a move..Why has Scott not said anything? I would be interested in his story.
He probably signed a non-disclosure agreement when he was hired.
__________________
I'm a big Caitlin Clark fan!
KI Skins Fan is offline  
Old 03-14-2017, 09:27 PM   #2
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,307
Re: Cousins 3.0, he's going to sign the franchise tag

If we don't get a long term with cousins and he walks next year...worse than the rg3 trade.

Because we would have a proven qb and still couldn't retain him. And then we had a opportunity to get something for him through a trade but because dan Snyder is a bitch bc 49er coach is a shanny, we chose to not to move him...
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us

Last edited by Chico23231; 03-14-2017 at 10:09 PM.
Chico23231 is offline  
Old 03-14-2017, 10:18 PM   #3
OmahaRedskins
Impact Rookie
 
OmahaRedskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 822
Re: Cousins 3.0, he's going to sign the franchise tag

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico23231 View Post
If we don't get a long term with cousins and he walks next year...worse than the rg3 trade.

Because we would have a proven qb and still couldn't retain him. And then we had a opportunity to get something for him through a trade but because dan Snyder is a bitch bc 49er coach is a shanny, we chose to not to move him...
Trade his ass to Cleveland for a 1st and 2nd this year or next year.
OmahaRedskins is offline  
Old 03-15-2017, 09:36 AM   #4
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,307
Re: Cousins 3.0, he's going to sign the franchise tag

Quote:
Originally Posted by OmahaRedskins View Post
Trade his ass to Cleveland for a 1st and 2nd this year or next year.
I think we should def use this as leverage to get a deal done. Also many folks reported 3 teams called about Cousins....this is nothing but good news.
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline  
Old 03-15-2017, 09:46 AM   #5
metalskins
The Starter
 
metalskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,464
Re: Cousins 3.0, he's going to sign the franchise tag

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico23231 View Post
I think we should def use this as leverage to get a deal done. Also many folks reported 3 teams called about Cousins....this is nothing but good news.
Agreed. For all the reporting and columns written about how Cousins has all of this leverage (and he still does, don't get me wrong), what was assumed is that the only trade partner the Redskins had was San Francisco. Therefore, even if they wanted to trade him, San Fran would dictate trade compensation. But seeing how other teams (even though they are nameless right now) have been rumored to be in the mix, and Cleveland being named (although I think it's merely a rumor to force Cousins' hand), I think we're starting to see some leverage go toward the Redskins.
__________________
Reserved for a witty signature.
metalskins is offline  
Old 03-15-2017, 09:28 AM   #6
metalskins
The Starter
 
metalskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,464
Re: Cousins 3.0, he's going to sign the franchise tag

The Browns are not going to have a chance to get Cousins. Not unless they were willing to give up a king's ransom, and even I don't believe the Browns would do that. That said, I have no doubt that these "rumors" were leaked in order to make Cousins a little nervous that he could be shipped off to Cleveland, in order to force his hand a little quicker with the negotiations. That said, Cousins has pretty much said that the tag dictates how his agent is going to negotiate, so if the Redskins would just simply offer close to that number, I think Cousins signs. Why wait until July 14th? Just get it done now so that this is no longer a distraction.
__________________
Reserved for a witty signature.
metalskins is offline  
Old 03-15-2017, 12:02 PM   #7
Schneed10
A Dude
 
Schneed10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 12,458
Re: Cousins 3.0, he's going to sign the franchise tag

Way too many chicken littles around here. But even if it's taken you this long to come around, it's still better late than never.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.
Schneed10 is offline  
Old 03-15-2017, 12:11 PM   #8
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,379
Re: Cousins 3.0, he's going to sign the franchise tag

Quote:
Originally Posted by Schneed10 View Post
Way too many chicken littles around here. But even if it's taken you this long to come around, it's still better late than never.
What I meant about changing my mind about Kirk, was that I thought he had this attitude that he wanted to leave the team because he did not feel wanted and whatnot.

It sounds like this "wanting to leave" may have been overblown or it may have been a negotiation tactic from his camp. Who knows, but it looks like things are somewhat normal and they are just doing the typical negotiations.

In the end, I don't see what's so terrible about the team moving forward. I feel that with some of the acquisitions we've gotten and getting Kirk back under center, I expect us to be competitive again in the upcoming season.
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline  
Old 03-15-2017, 12:38 PM   #9
metalskins
The Starter
 
metalskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,464
Re: Cousins 3.0, he's going to sign the franchise tag

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
What I meant about changing my mind about Kirk, was that I thought he had this attitude that he wanted to leave the team because he did not feel wanted and whatnot.

It sounds like this "wanting to leave" may have been overblown or it may have been a negotiation tactic from his camp. Who knows, but it looks like things are somewhat normal and they are just doing the typical negotiations.

In the end, I don't see what's so terrible about the team moving forward. I feel that with some of the acquisitions we've gotten and getting Kirk back under center, I expect us to be competitive again in the upcoming season.

There are some players in the league who are adamant about not wanting to play for certain teams. There's nothing to stop Cousins from saying he doesn't want to play for Washington. I don't think him stating such would hinder his leverage. The fact that he came out and denied that he demanded a trade and still spoke favorable with his relationship with the Redskins tells me that he just wants a long term contract. If it's the Redskins, fine, if it's the 49ers, fine. If it's the Browns......damn!!!! LOL!
__________________
Reserved for a witty signature.
metalskins is offline  
Old 03-15-2017, 01:18 PM   #10
hutch17
Special Teams
 
hutch17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 226
Re: Cousins 3.0, he's going to sign the franchise tag

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
What I meant about changing my mind about Kirk, was that I thought he had this attitude that he wanted to leave the team because he did not feel wanted and whatnot.

It sounds like this "wanting to leave" may have been overblown or it may have been a negotiation tactic from his camp. Who knows, but it looks like things are somewhat normal and they are just doing the typical negotiations.

In the end, I don't see what's so terrible about the team moving forward. I feel that with some of the acquisitions we've gotten and getting Kirk back under center, I expect us to be competitive again in the upcoming season.
I believe that as long as we keep Kirk (I do think he will sign a long term deal, especially after hearing his interview with Schefter) we are a better team today than we were at the end of the season.

Pryor and Doctson > Jackson and Garcon (especially for the money)
Baker was not that big of a loss, he was a lot of fun and my favorite player but he was overrated by our fan base
hutch17 is offline  
Old 03-15-2017, 12:33 PM   #11
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,307
Re: Cousins 3.0, he's going to sign the franchise tag

Quote:
Originally Posted by Schneed10 View Post
Way too many chicken littles around here. But even if it's taken you this long to come around, it's still better late than never.
but it better get done period. After this bullshit with McC, I better not hear any fucking excuses from Bruce. Get it done period

We don't need to extend the QB track record with Bruce/Danny anymore. Lets end it with a good deal for Cousins.

My general feeling right now is it does get done. Im 60-40....60% he signs, 30 he is traded, 10% he plays on it without signing


Where is everybody right percentage wise?
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline  
Old 03-15-2017, 12:42 PM   #12
Schneed10
A Dude
 
Schneed10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 12,458
Re: Cousins 3.0, he's going to sign the franchise tag

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico23231 View Post
but it better get done period. After this bullshit with McC, I better not hear any fucking excuses from Bruce. Get it done period

We don't need to extend the QB track record with Bruce/Danny anymore. Lets end it with a good deal for Cousins.

My general feeling right now is it does get done. Im 60-40....60% he signs, 30 he is traded, 10% he plays on it without signing


Where is everybody right percentage wise?
You're way off.

75% signed long term
20% plays under this franchise tag and is tagged again next year
4% plays under this franchise tag and is allowed to hit the open market
1% traded
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.
Schneed10 is offline  
Old 03-15-2017, 03:21 PM   #13
Giantone
Gamebreaker
 
Giantone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 14,608
Re: Cousins 3.0, he's going to sign the franchise tag

Who were the three teams??? We all know San Fran but who were the other two?
__________________
....DISCLAIMER: All of my posts/threads are my expressed typed opinion and the reader is not to assume these comments are absolute fact, law, or truth unless otherwise stated in said post/thread.
Giantone is offline  
Old 03-15-2017, 03:48 PM   #14
Schneed10
A Dude
 
Schneed10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 12,458
Re: Cousins 3.0, he's going to sign the franchise tag

Quote:
Originally Posted by Giantone View Post
Who were the three teams??? We all know San Fran but who were the other two?
Nobody has said.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.
Schneed10 is offline  
Old 03-15-2017, 12:42 PM   #15
Schneed10
A Dude
 
Schneed10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 12,458
Re: Cousins 3.0, he's going to sign the franchise tag

Three teams have asked and three teams have been rebuffed. He's not getting traded.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.
Schneed10 is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 2.36753 seconds with 11 queries