|
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
02-29-2004, 11:59 AM
|
#1 |
|
Thank You, Sean.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Age: 40
Posts: 7,506
|
If its #5 for 21/32, I would entertian it. But NE would never do that, so I say just use 5 for Sean Taylor
__________________
#21 |
|
|
|
03-01-2004, 12:03 AM
|
#2 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 43
Posts: 11
|
I just saw WUSA 9 reporting on the rumor of Portis going to NE for their 1 (only 1 out of 2) and 2 rd picks.
|
|
|
|
|
03-01-2004, 12:07 AM
|
#3 |
|
Thank You, Sean.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Age: 40
Posts: 7,506
|
So let me get this straight... Clinton Portis for the 21st and 64th picks in the draft?!?!?! That would be absoultey obsurd. I mean their second round pick is lower than ours was. So Essencially, we traded Champ Bailey for New Englands first round pick, if this deal was to go through. While we could have gotten a #6 from Detriot. How can anyone actually belive that. I mean break it down... we trade Champ Bailey and the 42nd pick in the draft for in the end ... the 21st and 64th pick in the draft? Are you f'n kidding me.. this thing is so bogus its not even funny.
__________________
#21 Last edited by Gmanc711; 03-01-2004 at 12:11 AM. |
|
|
|
|
03-01-2004, 11:22 AM
|
#4 |
|
Another Year, another mess.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,581
|
What I have heard on this deal is that we will trade portis for the patriots 2 first round picks and Ty Law. From there we will trade our 1st round & one of their patriots 1st rounds plus Gardner to San Diego to get Fitzgerald with the 1st overall pick. but I still think it would be kind of stupid because we would still have glaring hole at running back. :confused:
|
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
