Redskins Offseason Thread

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by GridIron26

You are right about true definition of winning records if we want to get technically with definition. I just don't see it that way. 9-7 means nothing if we don't go deep into playoffs. We can go 9-7 in a row for few years without playoff wins, would we be content with that? I highly doubt that.

Granted, we are talking about winning record specifically so I suppose you guys are right about this.

If you want to say contenders then I get your definition.
As for Vegas, I think we have risen slightly above Cleveland level, but we still haven't had a playoff win since '05, so I can understand their skepticism.

I would like to think with all the changes, and all the stability, we have a good few years for certain on the horizon, but the team still has to put it all together and be consistent about it.

[GridIron26]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

If you want to say contenders then I get your definition.
As for Vegas, I think we have risen slightly above Cleveland level, but we still haven't had a playoff win since '05, so I can understand their skepticism.

I would like to think with all the changes, and all the stability, we have a good few years for certain on the horizon, but the team still has to put it all together and be consistent about it.

You are right. I never pay attention to Las Vegas stuff so perhaps my comment was off the point.. And yes I agree with you on bold part.

[DYoungJelly]

Bovada just came out with the over under season win totals.

We are at 7. Their number on us last year was 7.5.

The super bowl odds are kinda a long shot bet. The over under is a much better indicator of what Vegas thinks.

I don't believe 7 is a huge slight. I think we will go over. I did last year too and was so pissed after the giants game if you know what I mean.

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

[JPPT1974]

Yeah as really think that they should had won against the Giants. And really hate that.

[Irrefutable]

It looks like 4 compensatory draft picks in 2019.

https://www.nbcsports.com/washington...2019-nfl-draft

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by Irrefutable

It looks like 4 compensatory draft picks in 2019.

https://www.nbcsports.com/washington...2019-nfl-draft

"The highest compensatory pick a team can get is a third rounder and that is what Washington will get for losing Kirk Cousins to the Vikings. His new contract averages $28 million per year, by far the highest of any UFA that changed teams. That should land the Redskins a pick near the top of the stack of the seven third-round selections awarded, almost assuring them a comp pick in the top 100.

In addition, the Redskins will get a fifth-round pick for losing OL Spencer Long and two sixth-round selections for losing WRs Ryan Grant and Terrell Pryor"


Pretty awesome we get compensation for garbage like Ryan Grant and Terrell Pryor.

That being said...outside of Interior Oline questions which are 100% legit with starters at LG and C...WR has the be the second area of the team Im moderately worried about. Our coaching there has been poor to match the performance of the group. Make or break for Doctson and Crowder, done with both if no improvement with either.

[SFREDSKIN]

Robert Davis coming along.

https://247sports.com/nfl/washington...kins-118076672

[skinsfaninok]

Originally Posted by SFREDSKIN

Robert Davis coming along.

https://247sports.com/nfl/washington...kins-118076672

good to hear

[Irrefutable]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

"The highest compensatory pick a team can get is a third rounder and that is what Washington will get for losing Kirk Cousins to the Vikings. His new contract averages $28 million per year, by far the highest of any UFA that changed teams. That should land the Redskins a pick near the top of the stack of the seven third-round selections awarded, almost assuring them a comp pick in the top 100.

In addition, the Redskins will get a fifth-round pick for losing OL Spencer Long and two sixth-round selections for losing WRs Ryan Grant and Terrell Pryor"


Pretty awesome we get compensation for garbage like Ryan Grant and Terrell Pryor.

That being said...outside of Interior Oline questions which are 100% legit with starters at LG and C...WR has the be the second area of the team Im moderately worried about. Our coaching there has been poor to match the performance of the group. Make or break for Doctson and Crowder, done with both if no improvement with either.

In the 2019 draft they need. TE, QB,OL..... BPA on defense. It is nice to have 11 picks at the start, maybe they trade up if they love a player.

[calia]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

"The highest compensatory pick a team can get is a third rounder and that is what Washington will get for losing Kirk Cousins to the Vikings. His new contract averages $28 million per year, by far the highest of any UFA that changed teams. That should land the Redskins a pick near the top of the stack of the seven third-round selections awarded, almost assuring them a comp pick in the top 100.

In addition, the Redskins will get a fifth-round pick for losing OL Spencer Long and two sixth-round selections for losing WRs Ryan Grant and Terrell Pryor"


Pretty awesome we get compensation for garbage like Ryan Grant and Terrell Pryor.

That being said...outside of Interior Oline questions which are 100% legit with starters at LG and C...WR has the be the second area of the team Im moderately worried about. Our coaching there has been poor to match the performance of the group. Make or break for Doctson and Crowder, done with both if no improvement with either.

I suspect the answer is no, but what about a pick for Breeland? He was signed away from us before May 8, even though it was voided. Does the contract have to be in place as of May 8? Assume that Indy cuts Grant in August, would we still get the pick? Not sure how this works, but if anyone knows, I'd be grateful for the education.

[calia]

I answered my own question -- we get nothing for Breeland because he wasn't signed by anyone as of May 8: https://www.nbcsports.com/washington...shaud-breeland

And we didn't do a tender (I wonder why) by which we could get a compensatory pick.

[FrenchSkin]

Originally Posted by calia

I answered my own question -- we get nothing for Breeland because he wasn't signed by anyone as of May 8: https://www.nbcsports.com/washington...shaud-breeland

And we didn't do a tender (I wonder why) by which we could get a compensatory pick.

I guess it means the concerns about his foot infection are serious and could linger for some while...
Sucks for him, and for us, having him back for 1M would have been one hell of a bargain, even with every body expecting 3rd round pick Moreau to step it up.

[GridIron26]

We might need WR as well if Doctson doesn't do much this year

[Irrefutable]

Originally Posted by GridIron26

We might need WR as well if Doctson doesn't do much this year

I agree, maybe two, if Crowder leaves.

[Chico23231]

We also need Paul Richardson to come in and do what he got paid for, stretch the field so crowder and doctson can work underneath.