![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 3,754
|
Re: The FINAL Kirk Cousins Saga thread. 5.0
Couldn't the NFLPA protest, and Goodell and Co. act, on the basis that they were limiting a player's (Cousins) potential earnings, as well as going way beyond tampering to collusion with other teams?
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,044
|
Re: The FINAL Kirk Cousins Saga thread. 5.0
Quote:
If all sides are on board I’m not sure what there is to protest |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 58
Posts: 21,744
|
Re: The FINAL Kirk Cousins Saga thread. 5.0
It all sounds like a fan's overarching ability to rationalize something that they want. It's never been done in the NFL that I know of, and maybe the Skins FO is just that smart to make it happen as laid out, ultimately the Skins are the only ones who really risk anything in that type of move.
If Denver promises, but backs out - they blame the Skins FO (rightly or wrongly) the Skins are stuck with KC on a tag, yes they could try to trade him to somewhere else, but who is going to trade for KC with his history of non-negotiation. If KC signs the tag right away, but then decides that he really just wants to collect aroun 80 million total from the Skins for 3 years and walk into the sunset after this year. The Skins are stuck with no FA space. If the Skins back out before the FT tag is signed, no one else is hurt. Going into negotiations where you are the only one with possible negative consequences is to risky a move to put the franchise under. Then you throw in an owner, who (supposedly) didn't want to give Kyle Shanahan any trade options, and I don't know why anyone would think that he would be happy to send KC anywhere he wants after paying him 40+Mil. |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,044
|
Re: The FINAL Kirk Cousins Saga thread. 5.0
I guess it’s hard to see a 3rd rounder being a big deal in getting the guy you want, and dumping Talib only helps their cap.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 39
Posts: 36,242
|
Re: The FINAL Kirk Cousins Saga thread. 5.0
The Eagles current payroll for both QB's is less than 15M a season lol that is unreal
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.” ― Nick Saban |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 58
Posts: 21,744
|
Re: The FINAL Kirk Cousins Saga thread. 5.0
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 39
Posts: 36,242
|
Re: The FINAL Kirk Cousins Saga thread. 5.0
I heard that they have almost every impact player coming back besides Graham who will prob demand a high pay day after this season.
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.” ― Nick Saban |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,586
|
Re: The FINAL Kirk Cousins Saga thread. 5.0
How could the Redskins sign free agents and resign their own free agents w/ both Cousins and Smith on the roster? No way that is happening. If the Redskins keep Cousins and Smith then they're just being assholes. Then it becomes very personal. No way they do that. Not even the Redskins would go that far...
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,044
|
Re: The FINAL Kirk Cousins Saga thread. 5.0
There’s no rules against trading a tagged player, and if he becomes the highest paid player in the league by the Broncos I don’t see how there’s a chance to protest it
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 3,754
|
Re: The FINAL Kirk Cousins Saga thread. 5.0
More I think about it, Macro's proposal is a bad idea. Let's start with tagging Cousins. That doesn't just put him out of free agency, it puts the Skins out of free agency, because the Skins cap is squeezed even with "just" the nonexclusive or transition tag, let along the FT. So again, the Skins FO have no leverage, unless they want to screw themselves and Cousins out of spite.
And why should Cousins trust the Skins at this point? Add to the NFLPA and league taking a dim view over this inventive way of using the tag, they might hit the Skins harder than they did in Capgate. I'm sure there are other ways this proposed deal is doomed, those are just what I see. |
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
A Dude
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 12,458
|
Re: The FINAL Kirk Cousins Saga thread. 5.0
Quote:
1) understanding that Cousins's destination of choice would be team A 2) understanding whether team A would be willing to part with draft picks or players or both 3) understanding that team A and Cousins are comfortable with the terms, given that they'll both want a long term resolution, not a short term one If all of these conditions are not satisfied, the tag will not be applied in the first place.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 3,754
|
Re: The FINAL Kirk Cousins Saga thread. 5.0
Quote:
2). Why would Cousins and his new team agree to hand the Skins draft picks or players? Unless the Skins try to leverage the tag in a way it's not supposed to be used. I can just hear Mara blubbering now about "the spirit of the tag". 3). Again, Cousins and team A can do that just fine in free agency themselves. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,464
|
Re: The FINAL Kirk Cousins Saga thread. 5.0
Quote:
However, now, with Alex Smith on board, I don't see it as likely. If it happens, it's a HUGE risk. Cousins would have to be willing and open to go along with it, and he hasn't shown any reason to want to help the Redskins unless he's actually starting quarterback.
__________________
Reserved for a witty signature. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Hanahan, South Carolina
Age: 42
Posts: 20,850
|
Re: The FINAL Kirk Cousins Saga thread. 5.0
I'm no Cousins fanboy, but let the man leave and get on with his life in FA. The juice isn't worth the squeeze.
We have plenty of cap space to sign a corner to replace Fuller or we can draft one. And we can acquire more picks in more traditional fashions. Time for all sides to move on. All Cousins has to do to blow this up is say that he won't sign the tag right away or sign tag immediately and tell all the other 31 teams he's leaving in FA in 2019.
__________________
"You can be my wingman anytime." "Bulls**t. You can be mine." |
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,044
|
Re: The FINAL Kirk Cousins Saga thread. 5.0
Yeah maybe it's not so easy...
http://www.espn.com/blog/washington-...e-kirk-cousins Franchise tag sign and trade: Because it would be a third franchise tag, according to the collective bargaining agreement it must be exclusive. That means only the Redskins can negotiate with Cousins. So, even during the legal tampering window before free agency, Cousins' agent would be unable to discuss contract numbers with other teams. Yes, there are ways around that, but there are also ways to let other teams know this: Cousins won't agree to any wink-wink extension before free agency. Because of the restrictions, it would raise eyebrows in the league if there were a deal in the first minute of free agency that includes an extension. |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|