The FINAL Kirk Cousins Saga thread. 5.0

[DYoungJelly]

Originally Posted by WillH

Again, I disagree about Brady (maybe not the fairest comparison), he gets good production from pedestrian WRs, it's what he does:
[url]http://www.nydailynews.com/sports/football/good-tom-brady-receiving-corps-article-1.2964308[/url

No. He gets good production from really freaking smart, versatile receivers who can run every route, inside and out and can also read coverages. They prioritize intelligence over raw talent.

http://www.espn980.com/cooley-and-kevin-with-chris-cooley-and-kevin-sheehan-podcasts/

Listen to 1-17-18 hour 3. The name of the segment is why the patriot receivers are always open.

Our 1 this year Doctson, only knew one receiver position. Or receiver corps was truly pathetic.

[WillH]

Originally Posted by DYoungJelly

No. He gets good production from really freaking smart, versatile recovers who can run every route, inside and out and can also read coverages.

http://www.espn980.com/cooley-and-ke...ehan-podcasts/

Listen to 1-17-18 hour 3. The name of the segment is why the patriot receivers are always open.

Our 1 this year Doctson, only knew one receiver position. Or receiver corps was truly pathetic.

Ok, either way, he did have numbers despite a lack of talent at receiver, but just like you're argument about Brady's receivers it comes down to coaches coaching and scheming these guys open. Cousins didn't have great WRs but he had a back, a slot, and two TEs that were playmakers and a coach scheming them and the backups open. Cousins had a few more baller plays this year where he kept plays alive with his legs, but he wasn't carrying the team on his shoulders by having to create something from nothing, instead he needed to trust the system find the open man and get it out quickly. He did that very well.

Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk