![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,044
|
Re: The FINAL Kirk Cousins Saga thread. 5.0
Assuming all sides get on board what Macro is saying makes sense. Should be interesting to see what happens.
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 3,754
|
Re: The FINAL Kirk Cousins Saga thread. 5.0
Even assuming our front office could pull this off with other teams, you don't think that the NFLPA, Goodell, and Mara & Co. would veto our gaming the system this way? (and maybe penalize us again?)
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,044
|
The FINAL Kirk Cousins Saga thread. 5.0
Quote:
How is it gaming the system especially now there’s a legal tampering period? I don’t know what they could do really |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 3,754
|
Re: The FINAL Kirk Cousins Saga thread. 5.0
Couldn't the NFLPA protest, and Goodell and Co. act, on the basis that they were limiting a player's (Cousins) potential earnings, as well as going way beyond tampering to collusion with other teams?
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,044
|
Re: The FINAL Kirk Cousins Saga thread. 5.0
Quote:
If all sides are on board I’m not sure what there is to protest |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 3,754
|
Re: The FINAL Kirk Cousins Saga thread. 5.0
I just don't think the Skins could get the NFLPA onboard with this. Too much opportunity for a team to threaten a player with the tag and lowball him this way. And abiding by the written rules hasn't stopped Goodell and Mara from penalizing us before...
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|