Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Redskins Offseason Thread

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-04-2018, 10:48 AM   #1
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,307
Re: Redskins Offseason Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigHairedAristocrat View Post
Interesting article suggesting that we should sign Breeland to a VFA tender before May 8th to get an improved compensatory pick next year.

https://www.hogshaven.com/2018/5/4/1...shaud-breeland


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
wow great find. Plus the Skins were interested in adding another CB, so worst case Bree comes back and competes at a very low salary.

Skins should totally do it.
Chico23231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2018, 12:42 PM   #2
Meks
Pro Bowl
 
Meks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: South Jersey
Age: 40
Posts: 5,928
Re: Redskins Offseason Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico23231 View Post
wow great find. Plus the Skins were interested in adding another CB, so worst case Bree comes back and competes at a very low salary.

Skins should totally do it.
while i agree it would be a good move - he seems to be a fucking cry baby - the type that if healthy we know will play - but someone who would get snippy over not starting, or someone who would just loaf all the time and ride the bench for a pay day -- i dunno, you would hope not, but, his past behavior tells me otherwise. So while I think they should do it, I hope they dont expect much out of the move lol
__________________
R.I.P #21SEAN TAYLOR
Meks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2018, 12:45 PM   #3
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,307
Re: Redskins Offseason Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Meks View Post
while i agree it would be a good move - he seems to be a fucking cry baby - the type that if healthy we know will play - but someone who would get snippy over not starting, or someone who would just loaf all the time and ride the bench for a pay day -- i dunno, you would hope not, but, his past behavior tells me otherwise. So while I think they should do it, I hope they dont expect much out of the move lol
Dude...Im there with you. But we were looking for CB in draft, and if one in particular would have fallen in the second round, we would have drafted him.


So it does fill a need...but I think the potential for a trade is great with his low cap number.
Chico23231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2018, 12:45 PM   #4
WillH
The Starter
 
WillH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,592
Re: Redskins Offseason Thread

The move allows them to trade him on a one year roughly 2 mil deal. That's a steal for a good corner. If he doesn't want to be here or they don't want him, it shouldn't be difficult to find a suitor once he can pass a physical.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Meks View Post
while i agree it would be a good move - he seems to be a fucking cry baby - the type that if healthy we know will play - but someone who would get snippy over not starting, or someone who would just loaf all the time and ride the bench for a pay day -- i dunno, you would hope not, but, his past behavior tells me otherwise. So while I think they should do it, I hope they dont expect much out of the move lol
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
__________________
You like that! You like that!
WillH is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.39672 seconds with 11 queries