Redskins have claimed LB Reuben Foster

[Schneed10]

What's not talked about enough is the risk / reward from the cap side of things. His cap number next year would be $1.3M if on our roster, and $1.7M in 2020. Absolutely none of that guaranteed. So we can dump him at any time with no cap ramifications.

We can also exercise the option for 2021, if we so chose.

Or, if he plays out his deal here, we can let him leave via free agency and get a comp pick in the deal, depending what he signs for elsewhere.

This is the biggest reason he was signed. No guaranteed money, no cap consequences, talented player. Lots of upside reasons that make you willing to weather the PR storm.

I definitely would have put in the claim myself.

[skinsfaninok]

Originally Posted by Schneed10

What's not talked about enough is the risk / reward from the cap side of things. His cap number next year would be $1.3M if on our roster, and $1.7M in 2020. Absolutely none of that guaranteed. So we can dump him at any time with no cap ramifications.

We can also exercise the option for 2021, if we so chose.

Or, if he plays out his deal here, we can let him leave via free agency and get a comp pick in the deal, depending what he signs for elsewhere.

This is the biggest reason he was signed. No guaranteed money, no cap consequences, talented player. Lots of upside reasons that make you willing to weather the PR storm.

I definitely would have put in the claim myself.

Yep, and for those saying "Why didn't they sign CK" It's because he hasn't played in 2 years and I have not seen any story of him training and actively looking for a job either..

[Schneed10]

Originally Posted by skinsfaninok

Yep, and for those saying "Why didn't they sign CK" It's because he hasn't played in 2 years and I have not seen any story of him training and actively looking for a job either..

Last I heard about his contract demands, he wanted a good $10M and didn't want to accept less than that because that's what he felt he was worth. If his salary demands dropped to reflect those of a backup QB who hasn't performed particularly well in recent seasons, he might get signed.

Foster counts $1.3M, none of it guaranteed. Kaepernick would cost much more than that.

The almighty dollar drives almost everything.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by Schneed10

What's not talked about enough is the risk / reward from the cap side of things. His cap number next year would be $1.3M if on our roster, and $1.7M in 2020. Absolutely none of that guaranteed. So we can dump him at any time with no cap ramifications.



We can also exercise the option for 2021, if we so chose.



Or, if he plays out his deal here, we can let him leave via free agency and get a comp pick in the deal, depending what he signs for elsewhere.



This is the biggest reason he was signed. No guaranteed money, no cap consequences, talented player. Lots of upside reasons that make you willing to weather the PR storm.



I definitely would have put in the claim myself.

From a pure football standpoint it makes total sense. For a team with an ongoing PR issues and waning interest from long time fans I wouldn’t have done it.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[skinsfaninok]

Originally Posted by MTK

From a pure football standpoint it makes total sense. For a team with an ongoing PR issues and waning interest from long time fans I wouldn’t have done it.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

To be honest Matt, unless the team changes the Logo or Name they will be hated on by the media. I was thinking about the team going to this look..


Change the Indian logo to a W and stick with the name. That way the Logo/Redskins can't be connected.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by skinsfaninok

To be honest Matt, unless the team changes the Logo or Name they will be hated on by the media. I was thinking about the team going to this look..





Change the Indian logo to a W and stick with the name. That way the Logo/Redskins can't be connected.

Yeah but it’s the name that people have a problem with.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Buffalo Bob]

It was also noted that in the last 16 games Foster played he hadn't recorded a sack, forced fumble, an interception or lead the team in tackles. Is the guy worth the potential trouble? Obviously in the NFL the better the player is the longer the leash for transgressions.

[irish]

Originally Posted by MTK

Yeah but it’s the name that people have a problem with.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

IMO it the name and logo combo that's the issue. That said I'd just drop the name Redskins and have the team call itself Washington. Keep everything else the same.

[skinsfaninok]

Originally Posted by irish

IMO it the name and logo combo that's the issue. That said I'd just drop the name Redskins and have the team call itself Washington. Keep everything else the same.

Have to have a nickname, I'd go with Warriors if that was the case.

[Buffalo Bob]

Kaepernick's early success was all a result of Jim Harbaugh tailoring the offense to emphasize his strengths and cover up his weaknesses. He also seemed to give the guy direction outside of football. Kap was 25-14 regular season with Harbaugh 3-16 after he left. Also the year after Harbaugh left all the above listed bad behavior started. Do note the protesting started after he was benched for Blaine Gabbert and demanded a trade. Kapernick would have to be a top 10 QB for teams to put up with all the baggage and nonsense. On the other hand he makes Jim Harbaugh look like a damn good head coach.

[irish]

Originally Posted by skinsfaninok

Have to have a nickname, I'd go with Warriors if that was the case.

Don't necessarily need a nickname.

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by MTK

From a pure football standpoint it makes total sense. For a team with an ongoing PR issues and waning interest from long time fans I wouldn’t have done it.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

When , conceivably, is the first time he could get on the field?

[MTK]

Originally Posted by punch it in

When , conceivably, is the first time he could get on the field?

Not until the league takes him off the exempt list

[metalskins]

Originally Posted by Schneed10

What's not talked about enough is the risk / reward from the cap side of things. His cap number next year would be $1.3M if on our roster, and $1.7M in 2020. Absolutely none of that guaranteed. So we can dump him at any time with no cap ramifications.

We can also exercise the option for 2021, if we so chose.

Or, if he plays out his deal here, we can let him leave via free agency and get a comp pick in the deal, depending what he signs for elsewhere.

This is the biggest reason he was signed. No guaranteed money, no cap consequences, talented player. Lots of upside reasons that make you willing to weather the PR storm.

I definitely would have put in the claim myself.

I'm really glad you mentioned this. For the people asking, "Why not sign Dez, why not sign Kaep, why not sign this player or that player", it's a low risk proposition for the 'skins in terms of money. The Redskins can pretty much drop Foster at any point without losing any money, and the fact that he's still on his rookie contract makes it pretty cheap as well. For someone like Dez or Kaep, much more expensive. Foster is young, and maybe, MAYBE, if he can keep his nose clean, he has a heck of a career ahead of him. Dez is at the end of his career, and Kaep hasn't played in over two years and sucked in that last year he did play.

Yeah, from a PR standpoint, it sucks, but you know what...the heck with PR. The sports media is always salivating over some bad press to come the Redskins way so they can pile on. Mike Jones has already written a scathing review on the move in USA Today. The way I see it is, they want to make this franchise out to be the bad guys, might as well live up to that and become the Stone Cold Steve Austins of the NFL world.