D.J. Swearinger released

[metalskins]

Originally Posted by FrenchSkin

I have one fear.

What if DJ being released (instead of just suspended for the final game) is somewhat of an endorsement of the coaching staff by the FO ?

I mean, if Jay and Manusky were getting canned next week, wouldn't you let it up to the next HC to decide if he wants to deal with a way too loud but overall solid player ?

I hope I'm wrong but, while I think cutting DJ was a painful but appropriate move, pretty much nobody expected that big of a sanction... So isn't it a signal that the FO is supporting the coaching staff?

Simple way to read it would be we got rid of a locker room distraction... but... IDK... I just don't want to be stuck with another year of mediocrity and false hopes...

Envoyé de mon SM-J320FN en utilisant Tapatalk

Someone on Twitter said that John Keim pointed out a strong possibility that both Gruden and Allen will be back next season.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[5superbowls3wins]

Originally Posted by metalskins

Someone on Twitter said that John Keim pointed out a strong possibility that both Gruden and Allen will be back next season.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

And that’s what upsets me. Everyone, and I mean EVERYONE, knows Allen, Manusky, and possibly Gruden need to go.

Yet, instead of Snyder removing the root of the problem they’ll simply cut our pro bowl talents who are speaking OF the problems going on behind closed doors. The same problems Foster, Norman, Brown have spoken about..

This front office and coaching staff have NO CREDIBILITY at this point, and they’ve proven that with their record and decisions over the past 5-6 years. Yet their decisions are being trusted to cut the talent we DO have.

It’s like a regime killing off protesters to keep the truth quiet.

You are what your record is, and that’s exactly what Bruce Allen and Gruden are.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[EdmundDorf]

The irony is that DJ speaking out may have been the thing that saved Manusky's job, the front office probably don't want to appear to have allowed a players public opinion to sway their decisions

[5superbowls3wins]

Originally Posted by EdmundDorf

The irony is that DJ speaking out may have been the thing that saved Manusky's job, the front office probably don't want to appear to have allowed a players public opinion to sway their decisions

And that’s the same level of nepotism and decision making that’s haunted this organization since 99.

But people support the DJ move, because they can’t see the bigger picture here

People laughed when I said it was a ploy.....we’ll see


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk