Walt Harris

[saskin]

Originally Posted by sniks

here we go again ramsey, jimoh, royal,harris let them go? everytime we lose a game we have to cut somebody?Come on fellas we just stink.Tos, big plays on def.and only 1 decent receiver.

Maybe your right...but Walt is pretty consistent in his poor play. Maybe not cut him but find someone to replace him, and if that involves cutting. Then do it.

[Duffman003]

Originally Posted by sniks

here we go again ramsey, jimoh, royal,harris let them go?

The thing about what you said is ramsey and jimoh don't start and royal doesn't do too much to hurt the team while harris got killed by wide recievers who are not quality players

[SUNRA]

Originally Posted by sniks

here we go again ramsey, jimoh, royal,harris let them go? everytime we lose a game we have to cut somebody?Come on fellas we just stink.Tos, big plays on def.and only 1 decent receiver.

Obviously you don't know this team because for the second week Moss has not been the key player in the game. Cooley and Sellers are not decent receivers? With pass protection, Brunell will make the play. This team is far from a suck-ass team. We dominated the 1# defense the entire 2nd half and still had a chance to win. I just hope the Raiders and Randy Moss are ready for ass whipping we are going to put on them. Sombody has got to pay.

[sniks]

my point ts every week its a team effort win or lose you cant cut everybody who plays poorly on any given week.The defense as a whole didnt play well enough to win.no sacks no ints.made simms into a probowler today.

[SUNRA]

Originally Posted by sniks

my point ts every week its a team effort win or lose you cant cut everybody who plays poorly on any given week.The defense as a whole didnt play well enough to win.no sacks no ints.made simms into a probowler today.

Remember, no Sean Taylor in backfield was devastating. I knew Prioleau woudn't hold it down. Where was Matt Bowen the entire game? Prioleau should not have played in front of him.

[sniks]

cooley and sellers are not deep threats. moss is the only one.

[SUNRA]

Originally Posted by sniks

cooley and sellers are not deep threats. moss is the only one.

What difference does it make what kind of WR Moss is. Cooley and Sellers are still decent WR's moreso than any other TE and FB combination in the league. Remember Sellers has more TDs (6) than Moss (5) So please save the rhetoric about the Redskins just having one decent WR.

[Longtimefan]

Our biggest problem on D is the lack of a pass rush. While Walt Harris did a poor job covering today, when you don't get pressure (without blitzing) it's just too much time in the pocket to get the job done. There's no way a rookie QB should have picked our D the way Simms did today.

[sniks]

finally some of you guys are starting to face reality.

[Beemnseven]

Originally Posted by sniks

finally some of you guys are starting to face reality.

First of all, I've always been a realist -- almost to the point of pessimism. I've seen the flaws of this team since week one, and I don't hesitate to point them out, even when they win.

While the Skins are worlds apart from where they were a year ago, one area steps up and improves one week, while another segment takes a step back. Pass rush and turnovers continue to be a problem with no solution in sight, even with the wizard Joe Gibbs involved.

I believe the history books will eventually tell the story of the 2005 Redskins as a "middle of the pack" team -- with a 'one and done' playoff appearance.

As always though, I hope I'm wrong.

[skinsguy]

Originally Posted by Beemnseven

First of all, I've always been a realist -- almost to the point of pessimism. I've seen the flaws of this team since week one, and I don't hesitate to point them out, even when they win.

While the Skins are worlds apart from where they were a year ago, one area steps up and improves one week, while another segment takes a step back. Pass rush and turnovers continue to be a problem with no solution in sight, even with the wizard Joe Gibbs involved.

I believe the history books will eventually tell the story of the 2005 Redskins as a "middle of the pack" team -- with a 'one and done' playoff appearance.

As always though, I hope I'm wrong.

I certainly agree that your pessimistic. If the Redskins are a middle of the pack team this year with at least one playoff game appearance, that is a whole heck of alot better than what we were just a year ago. That means improvement and progress. We're not going to change things overnight. Even if this team can only muster 9-7 or, gulp, 8-8, then it is still improvement and progress from what we were a year ago. That is something positive to build on. However, we still have seven more games to play this season, and anything can happen.

[saden1]

Roger stunk too. I think we really missed Sean Taylor today.

[sniks]

I agree BEEMNSEVEN.I didnt make that statement in a negative way its just some people on this board want to make excuses every week.Just face it we still have along way to go.

[sniks]

My point is Moss would be that much better with another TRUE reciever on the other side of him.Nothing against cooley or sellars they are invaluable to this team.

[SUNRA]

Originally Posted by sniks

My point is Moss would be that much better with another TRUE reciever on the other side of him.Nothing against cooley or sellars they are invaluable to this team.

Every winning team in the league is one player away from having a losing record.

I don't here any of the NFL experts criticizing Delhomme and Steve Smith, McNabb and T.O. or Manning and Plaxico Burress for having only one WR as a weapon. Every team has one outstanding WR and RB. That's it. Anything else is on the defensive side of the ball. That's the point I was trying to make.

I bet most people can't even name the the 2# receivers for most of the teams in the league with winning records.