![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: CT.
Age: 66
Posts: 97
|
Re: Walt Harris
My point is Moss would be that much better with another TRUE reciever on the other side of him.Nothing against cooley or sellars they are invaluable to this team.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,680
|
Re: Walt Harris
Quote:
I don't here any of the NFL experts criticizing Delhomme and Steve Smith, McNabb and T.O. or Manning and Plaxico Burress for having only one WR as a weapon. Every team has one outstanding WR and RB. That's it. Anything else is on the defensive side of the ball. That's the point I was trying to make. I bet most people can't even name the the 2# receivers for most of the teams in the league with winning records.
__________________
Redskins Member since 1970 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 52
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: Walt Harris
At this point, I really have no complaints about our passing game overall. Sooner or later though, if Moss has a bad game, and some team is able to shut him down, you would hope that David Patten is capable of picking up the slack.
I just think that Brunell is really in sync with Moss and Cooley. They are his favorite targets, they find ways to get open, and they make the catch. Would I like another Monk and Clark tandem? Sure. But as long as we can keep a winning record, I really don't care where the passes are distributed. The main concern now has to be the defense, with their non-existent pass rush, and big play weaknesses. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|