Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Why is David Patten on this team?

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-13-2005, 10:24 PM   #1
Redskin
Impact Rookie
 
Redskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: University of South Carolina
Age: 37
Posts: 577
Re: Why is David Patten on this team?

i think we misuse patten he is extremely fast
he should be runnin qiuck slants right across the middle and his speed is one of the reasons brunnel may be having trouble connecting with him and why defences feel the need to cause interferences, well see i think you guys give him farless credit then he deserves
Redskin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2005, 11:19 PM   #2
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 43
Posts: 17,620
Re: Why is David Patten on this team?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redskin
i think we misuse patten he is extremely fast
he should be runnin qiuck slants right across the middle and his speed is one of the reasons brunnel may be having trouble connecting with him and why defences feel the need to cause interferences, well see i think you guys give him farless credit then he deserves
19 for 193 after what? 9 games as a starter... i'd say he doesn't deserve much of anything right now.
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2005, 12:31 AM   #3
offiss
Registered User
 
offiss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 62
Posts: 3,097
Re: Why is David Patten on this team?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redskin
i think we misuse patten he is extremely fast
he should be runnin qiuck slants right across the middle and his speed is one of the reasons brunnel may be having trouble connecting with him and why defences feel the need to cause interferences, well see i think you guys give him farless credit then he deserves

You hit it on the head, he's very good on crossing patterns where he can run away from the defender.

As far as Patten stopping and waiting for the ball on comeback routes, Gibbs has been useing that play forever, Art Monk made a living on those type of routes, the problem is you really should have a big physical reciever who can body up on the defender, we really don't have that right now.
offiss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2005, 05:55 PM   #4
Kevikazi
Special Teams
 
Kevikazi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Maryland
Age: 56
Posts: 187
Re: Why is David Patten on this team?

Moss is faster than Patten. And Brunell has no problems hitting him with passes. Personally, I'm not impressed with Patten. I've seen Patten drop way too many passes for a veteran.
Kevikazi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2005, 06:45 PM   #5
amorentz
Special Teams
 
amorentz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Age: 46
Posts: 368
Re: Why is David Patten on this team?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redskin
i think we misuse patten he is extremely fast
he should be runnin qiuck slants right across the middle and his speed is one of the reasons brunnel may be having trouble connecting with him and why defences feel the need to cause interferences, well see i think you guys give him farless credit then he deserves
His SPEED is why Brunell cant hit him? Patten is just such a blur that Brunell cant even see him? Well Brunell seems to hit Santana "Im just faster than the rest of the NFL" Moss just fine!
amorentz is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.14186 seconds with 11 queries