Medical/Recreational Marijuana thread

[RobH4413]

Originally Posted by Schneed10

If you prefer a more reputable source than your collar popping, plaid shorts wearing, spiked hair bros making duck faces in pictures, we'll go straight to the source.

UC Davis who conducted the study, a summary:
https://health.ucdavis.edu/publish/news/newsroom/10874

The study itself as written in the journal of Clinical Psychological Science:
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/ful...67702616630958

But it's a terrible study by almost any metric.

It's an approx n=900 study, exclusively in New Zealand and based off of arbitrary self reported metrics, only up to age 38. So yeah, tight bro. Also, where are the risk numbers? Absolute vs. relative risk? I can't find them anywhere.

I think this is a case where you can use common sense. If you are just trolling, then tight I guess...

It's just as annoying to act like pot is the scourge of the earth, as it is to promote the, "CBD vape life cures cancer bruh," attitude. They are both misinformed and obnoxious.

[Schneed10]

Originally Posted by RobH4413

But it's a terrible study by almost any metric.

It's an approx n=900 study, exclusively in New Zealand and based off of arbitrary self reported metrics, only up to age 38. So yeah, tight bro. Also, where are the risk numbers? Absolute vs. relative risk? I can't find them anywhere.

I think this is a case where you can use common sense. If you are just trolling, then tight I guess...

It's just as annoying to act like pot is the scourge of the earth, as it is to promote the, "CBD vape life cures cancer bruh," attitude. They are both misinformed and obnoxious.

Oh I'm definitely obnoxious.