Dwayne Haskins

[KI Skins Fan]

Originally Posted by skinsfaninok

I hope Jay and co. can get creative for Haskins

Jay creative? Prepare yourself to be disappointed.

[DYoungJelly]

Originally Posted by KI Skins Fan

Jay creative? Prepare yourself to be disappointed.

I would really like to hear an explanation of last year's debacle as detailed in Cooley's series of podcasts.

Jay was a very good offensive mind in Cincy. The notion that he turned into a complete dunce isn't plausible.

I haven't heard anything resembling an explanation of the disjointed approach of the running v passing.

There has been a a lot of innuendo particularly from Sheehan that Callahan and Jay were an arranged marriage by the Prince of Darkness.

Any explanation would satisfy a lot of curiosity.


Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

[sevier2]

Originally Posted by DYoungJelly

I would really like to hear an explanation of last year's debacle as detailed in Cooley's series of podcasts.

Jay was a very good offensive mind in Cincy. The notion that he turned into a complete dunce isn't plausible.

I haven't heard anything resembling an explanation of the disjointed approach of the running v passing.

There has been a a lot of innuendo particularly from Sheehan that Callahan and Jay were an arranged marriage by the Prince of Darkness.

Any explanation would satisfy a lot of curiosity.


Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

I think a lack of options had a lot to do with the plays we ran.

Realistically, how much of a playbook can you expect to run with Josh Johnson and Mark Sanchez under center?

[DYoungJelly]

Originally Posted by sevier2

I think a lack of options had a lot to do with the plays we ran.



Realistically, how much of a playbook can you expect to run with Josh Johnson and Mark Sanchez under center?

The limitations don't explain the the disconnection between the run and pass game.

In other words, the new personnel doesn't explain why the runs don't look like the passes.

The team continued to rely on play action into the TN and Philly games without getting any LBs to bite.

Disagree?

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

[sevier2]

Originally Posted by DYoungJelly

The limitations don't explain the the disconnection between the run and pass game.

In other words, the new personnel doesn't explain why the runs don't look like the passes.

The team continued to rely on play action into the TN and Philly games without getting any LBs to bite.

Disagree?

Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk

I'll agree there are formation issues that need to be acknowledged. The whole "73% Run plays while Sprinkle is in" or whatever the stat was, is just inexcusable.

Regarding the play action late in the season; I can see why they would go that route. We had/have ZERO threats on the outside. Our entire offense practically came down to what AP could give us. As our only legitimate threat (Remember he went 90 yards against the Eagles) it would make sense to try and bait a defense into thinking he was getting the rock.

I think you're right and there's a legitimate case to be made that having Callahan call the run plays while Gruden calls pass plays (With O'Connell's input?) just sort of clogs up the play calling. Too many cooks in the kitchen, so to say.