Guice injured again

[Schneed10]

Jay wanted Peterson gone. Front office said no.

It's pretty bad when Bruce Allen makes you look incompetent.

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by Schneed10

Jay wanted Peterson gone. Front office said no.

It's pretty bad when Bruce Allen makes you look incompetent.

Ha...it also kinda stinks when the Front office and Coach cant get on the same page. But AP back is big...but I wouldn't be surprised if CT gets a lot of run.

[Schneed10]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

Ha...it also kinda stinks when the Front office and Coach cant get on the same page. But AP back is big...but I wouldn't be surprised if CT gets a lot of run.

Yeah we don't lose much if anything. Allen and Guice both happened and it sucks, but they happened at positions of strength/depth for us. We should be able to hold up.

The question is are we any good in the first place. lol

[Back2RFK]

Originally Posted by Schneed10

Jay wanted Peterson gone. Front office said no.

It's pretty bad when Bruce Allen makes you look incompetent.

Where did you see that?

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by Back2RFK

Where did you see that?

The fact he placed him inactive first game confirmed the rumor that there was serious discussions on Jay wanting to cut him after the preseason.

Jay's history of player decisions haven't been good.

[Meks]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

The fact he placed him inactive first game confirmed the rumor that there was serious discussions on Jay wanting to cut him after the preseason.

Jay's history of player decisions haven't been good.

Jay's a moron.

[Buffalo Bob]

Originally Posted by Schneed10

Jay wanted Peterson gone. Front office said no.

It's pretty bad when Bruce Allen makes you look incompetent.

Listening to B-Mitch today, driving around running errands, he believes Gruden was being spiteful by making AP inactive and it was a dumb ass move. That dumb ass were his exact words, I didn't think you could say that on the radio.

[GridIron26]

Originally Posted by Buffalo Bob

Listening to B-Mitch today, driving around running errands, he believes Gruden was being spiteful by making AP inactive and it was a dumb ass move. That dumb ass were his exact words, I didn't think you could say that on the radio.

This is a great example of how I am frustrated about how many people literally accept someone's opinion as a factual information. We have seen it everywhere, especially in politics lately.. This often leads to bad assumptions and spreads misinformation..

I read one interview transcript with Gruden after the game earlier today, Gruden said that he chose to keep Peterson inactive for the Eagles game only because he doesn't play special team. Gruden knew Eagles will use Sproles as returner so he wanted players who can help contain Sproles. I understand where Gruden came from, I don't agree with the move but I am not holding it against him.

[Warthog]

Originally Posted by GridIron26

This is a great example of how I am frustrated about how many people literally accept someone's opinion as a factual information. We have seen it everywhere, especially in politics lately.. This often leads to bad assumptions and spreads misinformation..

I read one interview transcript with Gruden after the game earlier today, Gruden said that he chose to keep Peterson inactive for the Eagles game only because he doesn't play special team. Gruden knew Eagles will use Sproles as returner so he wanted players who can help contain Sproles. I understand where Gruden came from, I don't agree with the move but I am not holding it against him.

Do you believe that was the real reason? I don't understand why Guice had to carry the whole load for the running game when:

1. His first NFL game - ever.
2. After spending the previous season down with an ACL - first regular season return game after injury.

I know he was cleared to play by the medical staff. I know he only ran for 10 carries. Still, wouldn't a LITTLE caution be prudent under these two conditions?

[Chief X_Phackter]

Originally Posted by Warthog

Do you believe that was the real reason? I don't understand why Guice had to carry the whole load for the running game when:

1. His first NFL game - ever.
2. After spending the previous season down with an ACL - first regular season return game after injury.

I know he was cleared to play by the medical staff. I know he only ran for 10 carries. Still, wouldn't a LITTLE caution be prudent under these two conditions?

There were two other RBs active for the game. He didn't have to (and didn't) carry the whole load.