Super Bowl week: around the NFL

[AnonEmouse]

Thats why I'm going with the Chiefs. Mahomes is a difference maker and he showed that last 2 games and then some. Jimmy G is good, they wouldn't be in the game without him. But I don't see him as being that guy, if he was the Pats wouldn't have traded him. If it comes down to it, I go with the hot QB.

[Buffalo Bob]

Originally Posted by AnonEmouse

Thats why I'm going with the Chiefs. Mahomes is a difference maker and he showed that last 2 games and then some. Jimmy G is good, they wouldn't be in the game without him. But I don't see him as being that guy, if he was the Pats wouldn't have traded him. If it comes down to it, I go with the hot QB.

I definitely agree on that, especially since he was traded for a second. The Patriots rarely get the short end of a trade deal. Belichick letting him go for a second screams, good, not great QB. I do think the talking heads don't give Jimmy G the credit he deserves. He has went 19-5 since joining a team that was 1-10 before he got his first start, so that makes him a winner and better than most.

Anyone else listen to Colin Cowherd? I swear before the play-offs started he was saying Garoppolo was the 49ers weak link, this past week he has been praising him. I swear Cowherd seems to change his mind about things every time the wind blows a different direction.

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by AnonEmouse

Thats why I'm going with the Chiefs. Mahomes is a difference maker and he showed that last 2 games and then some. Jimmy G is good, they wouldn't be in the game without him. But I don't see him as being that guy, if he was the Pats wouldn't have traded him. If it comes down to it, I go with the hot QB.

Rumor is that Belichick wanted to keep Jimmy G and Brady wanted him gone, ownership sided with Brady. The trade to the 49ers was probably Belichick wanting to help Jimmy G land in a more promising team (since the Browns were the main contender to get him that year).