![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
The Starter
![]() Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UK, South
Posts: 1,926
|
Re: Offseason Roster Moves Thread
Seriously though..... if you look at the "well run" teams, recently the MO is to get them signed or to tag and trade them, if they don't like him well enough by now to sign him to the deal he wants it is unlikely that they will meet his demands...... depends on how much they like Wes Martin I would suppose, with Trent looking doubtful to return maybe they go into a genuine rebuild mode, hence the desire to trade down with Miami in the draft. Smithers would have tagged him and then sat on his rights in the confidence that he will cave eventually, look how that worked out with Trent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 331
|
Re: Offseason Roster Moves Thread
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
The Starter
![]() Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: UK, South
Posts: 1,926
|
Re: Offseason Roster Moves Thread
You are of course right but my point was that we all realise it was always about money with Trent, Bruce knew that but didn't want to pay him a top of the market deal (and for the record I don't think he is worth $20m aav) and rather than trade him while he had value he chose to make it a personal battle of wills.... whether a player overates his value or not, front offices have a pretty good idea where the market will be set a couple of years ahead of time, and they should already have a pretty good idea whether they think the guy is worth it, if not they should trade the player like Seattle and Kansas City have done recently when tagging players
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|