Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Campbell, now!

Locker Room Main Forum


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 11-25-2005, 09:47 AM   #10
skinsguy
Pro Bowl
 
skinsguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
Re: Campbell, now!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ramseyfan
True, but I don't think our losses can be attributed to Brunell. Aside from Cooley and Moss, we haven't had any receiving threats and Mos has been effectively neutralized the past few weeks. Moreover, while our defense has played pretty well, our pass rush sucks. I don't think we can blame Brunell for a lack of a pass rush or decent #2 and #3 wideouts.
Exactly, I agree! What I meant by saying Brunell is 5-5 is to remind people of the entire season. The defeatests who want to throw in the towel now ignore the first three games in order to paint a different picture of Brunell. I believe this is just for some type of justification to put the entire blame on the quarterback.

How does putting in another QB help the defense to put more pressure on the opposing team's qb? How does it help us to cover the other team's receivers more? It's an agrument that is always the easiest to turn to. Anything that goes wrong, it must be immediately blamed on either the quarterback or the coach.
__________________
"Fire Up That Diesel!"
skinsguy is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.33277 seconds with 11 queries