Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Off-Topic Discussion > Debating with the enemy

Debating with the enemy Discuss politics, current events, and other hot button issues here.


When is Enough ,Enough?

Debating with the enemy


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-02-2020, 03:43 PM   #1
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
Re: When is Enough ,Enough?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico23231 View Post
You understand what assault is right?
Are you saying the cop was assaulted? Come on man
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2020, 03:52 PM   #2
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,307
Re: When is Enough ,Enough?

Quote:
Originally Posted by MTK View Post
Are you saying the cop was assaulted? Come on man
Walking towards the officer, threatened, racial insults while the officer backs away...she bumps him. That’s it, u can’t do that. The person may be drunk or high...cause she ain’t acting rational, it’s also open hand and not closed fist he gives her.

I’m sorry it’s violent but it’s within the officer right.
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2020, 04:01 PM   #3
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
Re: When is Enough ,Enough?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico23231 View Post
Walking towards the officer, threatened, racial insults while the officer backs away...she bumps him. That’s it, u can’t do that. The person may be drunk or high...cause she ain’t acting rational, it’s also open hand and not closed fist he gives her.

I’m sorry it’s violent but it’s within the officer right.
Apparently the Miami PD doesn't agree since the cop has been let go and is under a criminal investigation
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2020, 08:30 PM   #4
mredskins
Gamebreaker
 
mredskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 13,235
Re: When is Enough ,Enough?

Quote:
Originally Posted by MTK View Post
Apparently the Miami PD doesn't agree since the cop has been let go and is under a criminal investigation
There is a difference between restraining someone and assaulting someone. That was straight assault.

I will say she baited him into it, shame on him for taking the bait.
__________________
When life gives you paper jams, turn them into paper footballs!
mredskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2020, 08:20 AM   #5
mooby
Hug Anne Spyder
 
mooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,596
Re: When is Enough ,Enough?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mredskins View Post
There is a difference between restraining someone and assaulting someone. That was straight assault.

I will say she baited him into it, shame on him for taking the bait.
Agreed. But if you're gonna be a cop, you need to be in control of your emotions. You gotta check yourself before you wreck yourself. He didn't, and he paid the price for it.
__________________
Hail to the Football Team
mooby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2020, 05:21 PM   #6
Giantone
Gamebreaker
 
Giantone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 14,606
Re: When is Enough ,Enough?

After the way this year has gone I could see this happening as sad as it would be.


Trump has a plan to stay in the White House if he loses election, former senator says

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-pla...162113382.html


President Donald Trump is scheming to retain power in the event of an electoral loss in November, according to a former Senator from Colorado.

Tim Wirth published an op-ed in Newsweek where he lays out his theory, apparently inspired in-part by HBO's adaptation of the Philip Roth novel The Plot Against America.

The former Democratic senator begins with an allegation that Mr Trump will attempt to retain power through voter suppression. Mr Wirth alleges there is a strategy to suppress voter turnout by purging voters - especially inner-city voters - from registration rolls and to suppress mail-in voting. He also believes physical polling locations will be limited, especially in urban areas, in an effort to create long lines on Election Day and discourage voting.

Mr Wirth's allegations that there has been an effort in Republican-led states to remove people from the voter-roll is accurate.

According to Mr Wirth, should Mr Trump lose in a scenario where challenger Joe Biden beats him by "decent but not overwhelming" margins in the swing states of Arizona, Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania, Mr Trump will declare that the vote was rigged.

He will supposedly blame mail-in ballots and Chinese election interference for the loss and invoke emergency powers to launch a Justice Department investigation into alleged "election hacking" in the swing states.

From there, Mr Wirth claims Mr Trump will stall until 14 December, which is the date when states must appoint their US Electoral College electors. Because the swing states are each controlled by Republicans, Mr Wirth believes the state legislatures will refuse to certify their electors until the election hacking investigation is finished.

He then claims the Democrats will challenge the investigation and the challenge to the election, which will eventually be taken to the US Supreme Court. Mr Wirth believes the Supreme Court will rule against the Republicans, but will concede that Mr Trump's emergency powers authorise him to continue his investigation. The Supreme Court will also maintain that should the swing states not be able to certify their selectors by 14 December - for any reason - then the Electoral College will have to meet and vote for the president without the swing states included.

Under Mr Wirth's theory, the Electoral College will then meet without the swing states under investigation, and neither candidate will receive enough votes to secure the presidency. According to Mr Wirth, the contested election would then move to the House of Representatives, where each delegation gets to cast one vote towards the presidency.

Since there are more Republican controlled House delegations than Democratic controlled delegations - 26 Republican to 23 Democrats - the Republicans will be the victors of the vote and Mr Trump will remain in office.
__________________
....DISCLAIMER: All of my posts/threads are my expressed typed opinion and the reader is not to assume these comments are absolute fact, law, or truth unless otherwise stated in said post/thread.
Giantone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2020, 12:51 PM   #7
SolidSnake84
Playmaker
 
SolidSnake84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Stephens City, VA
Posts: 2,953
Re: When is Enough ,Enough?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Giantone View Post
After the way this year has gone I could see this happening as sad as it would be.


Trump has a plan to stay in the White House if he loses election, former senator says

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-pla...162113382.html


President Donald Trump is scheming to retain power in the event of an electoral loss in November, according to a former Senator from Colorado.

Tim Wirth published an op-ed in Newsweek where he lays out his theory, apparently inspired in-part by HBO's adaptation of the Philip Roth novel The Plot Against America.

The former Democratic senator begins with an allegation that Mr Trump will attempt to retain power through voter suppression. Mr Wirth alleges there is a strategy to suppress voter turnout by purging voters - especially inner-city voters - from registration rolls and to suppress mail-in voting. He also believes physical polling locations will be limited, especially in urban areas, in an effort to create long lines on Election Day and discourage voting.

Mr Wirth's allegations that there has been an effort in Republican-led states to remove people from the voter-roll is accurate.

According to Mr Wirth, should Mr Trump lose in a scenario where challenger Joe Biden beats him by "decent but not overwhelming" margins in the swing states of Arizona, Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania, Mr Trump will declare that the vote was rigged.

He will supposedly blame mail-in ballots and Chinese election interference for the loss and invoke emergency powers to launch a Justice Department investigation into alleged "election hacking" in the swing states.

From there, Mr Wirth claims Mr Trump will stall until 14 December, which is the date when states must appoint their US Electoral College electors. Because the swing states are each controlled by Republicans, Mr Wirth believes the state legislatures will refuse to certify their electors until the election hacking investigation is finished.

He then claims the Democrats will challenge the investigation and the challenge to the election, which will eventually be taken to the US Supreme Court. Mr Wirth believes the Supreme Court will rule against the Republicans, but will concede that Mr Trump's emergency powers authorise him to continue his investigation. The Supreme Court will also maintain that should the swing states not be able to certify their selectors by 14 December - for any reason - then the Electoral College will have to meet and vote for the president without the swing states included.

Under Mr Wirth's theory, the Electoral College will then meet without the swing states under investigation, and neither candidate will receive enough votes to secure the presidency. According to Mr Wirth, the contested election would then move to the House of Representatives, where each delegation gets to cast one vote towards the presidency.

Since there are more Republican controlled House delegations than Democratic controlled delegations - 26 Republican to 23 Democrats - the Republicans will be the victors of the vote and Mr Trump will remain in office.

Not a Trump fan obviously but some of this crap is getting harder and harder to believe. I can see a headline now where someone accuses Trump of cannibalism or something far out crazy, and the lame stream media run with it like gospel. It's really sad. I think about so many people who really won't have anything going for them when Trump isn't President anymore.

Trevor Noah wasn't funny before Donald Trump, and now he has made a whole show out of making fun of him. Same thing with Saturday Night live. Once Trump is out of office, suddenly it isn't going to be as funny making fun of an ex-president.

I fully think that Donald Trump will lose by a land slide, the likes of which this country has never witnessed before. I think by 6:30 - 7PM on election night, it will be over with. Trump will call that night by 8pm and acknowledge defeat. There's no crazy plan for him to remain President for life, or anything anyone might believe. When it is all said and done he is going to go on to other stuff. He is not going to hatch a super top secret evil plan to stay in the white house, FFS.
__________________
Time to nut up or shut up
SolidSnake84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 2.41580 seconds with 11 queries