Supreme Court vacancy

[CRedskinsRule]

Originally Posted by sdskinsfan2001

This is an opinion piece. But it's from the WSJ. I think 99% of us hold them as a credible organization and this carries at least a bit more weight than the average opinion piece.



https://www.wsj.com/articles/harry-r...cy-11602803203



I admit I have never followed the judicial appointment procedures as close as I should have, so a lot of this is new info to me. If anyone posts an article about the same issue from a different perspective I'll read it.

The article needed a login to the WSJ. Bummers

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

[sdskinsfan2001]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

The article needed a login to the WSJ. Bummers

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

WSJ is tricky. I literally was able to read the whole article, then it brought up subscribing, after I was already done reading. I don't have a subscription to WSJ. I assumed that article was free. Ignore my link. My apologies.

The article was basically about Harry Reid changing the rules to get some local DC judges appointed, and McConnell told him it would not work out well. I don't even like Turtle. And not trying to justify any action by anyone after that. That was the just the jist of the article. Basically was a piece about the state we're in now, slanted more towards blaming the left a little more than the right. And that is why I offered that I would read any article from the other perspective.

Edit - Posting a WSJ article is like posting an NFL.com mock draft article. No one actually gets to read it.