Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


WFT Wild Card Pre-Game Thread

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-06-2021, 12:56 PM   #1
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,095
Re: WFT Wild Card Pre-Game Thread

The OL has been very solid all year
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2021, 01:06 PM   #2
Chief X_Phackter
Pro Bowl
 
Chief X_Phackter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 5,644
Re: WFT Wild Card Pre-Game Thread

I guess they've been solid. Maybe being ranked 28th in the league in yards per carry is on the RBs, and 29th in sacks allowed is on the QBs.
Chief X_Phackter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2021, 01:23 PM   #3
FrenchSkin
Playmaker
 
FrenchSkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Yokohama, Japan
Posts: 4,525
Re: WFT Wild Card Pre-Game Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by MTK View Post
The OL has been very solid all year
I agree, but I think pass pro has been way better than run blocking.
__________________
Derz Ambassaderz in the Land of the Rising Sun. Oui Monsieur.
FrenchSkin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2021, 02:00 PM   #4
Chief X_Phackter
Pro Bowl
 
Chief X_Phackter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 5,644
Re: WFT Wild Card Pre-Game Thread

Doesn't add up to me. I'm not sure how you can be ranked 28th in the league in yards per carry and 29th in sacks allowed, but still have the 6th best O-line.
Chief X_Phackter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2021, 02:11 PM   #5
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,095
Re: WFT Wild Card Pre-Game Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chief X_Phackter View Post
Doesn't add up to me. I'm not sure how you can be ranked 28th in the league in yards per carry and 29th in sacks allowed, but still have the 6th best O-line.
Offensive linemen often don’t get the recognition they deserve because it’s a difficult position to evaluate — one without readily available statistics to pull up in seconds. That's why the PFF play-by-play grading gives us a unique perspective regarding offensive line play, as it separates the play of the offensive line from the play of the quarterback it is protecting or the runner it is blocking for.

Final 2020 offensive line rankings
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2021, 02:33 PM   #6
Chief X_Phackter
Pro Bowl
 
Chief X_Phackter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 5,644
Re: WFT Wild Card Pre-Game Thread

Ok. Well I would surmise then, that the RB and QB positions must be graded terribly if the O-line is that good, but the passing game/running game are so bad.
Chief X_Phackter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2021, 08:51 PM   #7
skinsfaninok
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 39
Posts: 36,242
Re: WFT Wild Card Pre-Game Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chief X_Phackter View Post
Doesn't add up to me. I'm not sure how you can be ranked 28th in the league in yards per carry and 29th in sacks allowed, but still have the 6th best O-line.
That is PFF grades , should have clarified that
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.”
― Nick Saban
skinsfaninok is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.17140 seconds with 11 queries